English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

The saying is " It is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all" . . . . . . . and I totally agree !

2006-08-27 11:19:19 · answer #1 · answered by Jean M 3 · 1 0

no, because if you never loved at all you really don't know what you're missing. on the other hand to love in lose means you'll forever be miserable and regret bringing the donkey into the sack as a "surprise"

2006-08-28 04:07:39 · answer #2 · answered by SHARKIE 1 · 0 0

Yes, Ihave loved several lost several but I have very fond memories of all and I wouldn't trade those for anything.If you have ever loved or been loved would you rather have the pain of loosing that or never experience the joy that comes with it? my advice fall in love as often as you can even if one day it is with the same person over and over again.

2006-08-27 18:20:51 · answer #3 · answered by pink leo 2 · 1 0

V tough but on balance probably yes

2006-08-27 18:54:33 · answer #4 · answered by MB42 3 · 0 0

yes because if you have never loved you have never known what love feels like, and you will become heartless and cruel.

2006-08-27 18:37:02 · answer #5 · answered by fae 6 · 0 0

...if you've been loved (and discarded), then cynicism is next. But you never find out the after effects unless you've done it.

2006-08-27 18:20:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It hurt like hell but I wouldn't have missed it for the world.

2006-08-27 18:27:53 · answer #7 · answered by ragdoll 3 · 0 0

no, it's better to have never been born in the first place

2006-08-27 18:20:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yeah defo. better happy memories than no memories when it goes belly up

2006-08-27 18:30:45 · answer #9 · answered by Barson 6 · 0 0

It hurts but it is true.

2006-08-27 18:20:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers