2006-08-27 07:08:09 · 17 answers · asked by steelerguy92868 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Hell Yes! Pardoned and promoted!
I can't belive our government went and found this drug dealer so he could sue!
Sounds fishy!
You don't think our government could be involved in the drug trade do you???
Drug war + open borders = BS!
Thanks Bush there is now MORE than enough drugs to go around for my children and it's CHEAPER!
2006-08-27 07:42:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If we just let the courts do their jobs then a lot of people cleared by DNA evidence would still be locked up today. How many pro illegals are actually sending this poor guy money until the outcome of his lawsuit is decided to help with his pain and suffering and lost wages for being unable to deliever drugs.
2006-08-27 08:17:31 · answer #2 · answered by Zoe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. They were doing their jobs. The guy supposedly shot at them first. Why should drug smugglers be protected and border patrol agents be punished for doing their job? This is nuts. We might as well not have a border patrol and hang up a sign that says "Welcome all drug smugglers and terrorists."
2006-08-27 07:16:29 · answer #3 · answered by aphid_dew 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
They did shoot the guy, when he was trying to run back to Mexico, but we need to remember this guy is a drug smuggler. Our law enforcment officers put their lives on the line ever day for us. Accidents will happen, and If they made a mistake and shoot some one trying to enter the U.S. illegally with a van full of drugs.............. WHO CARES, he is a villian and needed to be taken down, he has no right to sue the U.S. . He is a drug dealer he should have no rights.
2006-08-27 07:21:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I don't care if they discharged their guns and didn't report it, they are dealing with drug dealers and all kinds of scum, The guy got what he deserved, and the jury was wrong, juries are often wrong when the don't here all the evidence. I hope the get pardoned, and I think they should change the law to shoot on site, any one dealing drugs. that drug dealer is getting away with a crime and suing the government for money, and you no what he will probably get it.
2006-08-27 07:29:51 · answer #5 · answered by hexa 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Well technically, they did apparently break the law .. but then again, so did about 20 million illegals ... sooooo .... if we don't want to bother about enforcing existing immigration laws, I don't see why we should enforce the law that convicted the border patrol agents .... if there had been no illegal immigration, they wouldn't be in the pickle they're in now ....
2006-08-27 07:23:47 · answer #6 · answered by Sashie 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
the dollar nevertheless stops with him-he's (grow to be) a real president edit he had the nerve to make blunders devoid of teleprompter and all human beings to comprise howard stern and letterman needed revenge for 9/11
2016-09-30 23:04:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, he'll pardon Jeffery Skilling of Exxon.
2006-08-27 07:14:34 · answer #8 · answered by Feathery 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No.
Your assertion that they were "wrongly convicted" is based, I assume, on your personal ideas about what's right and wrong, regardless of what the law says.
They were convicted by a jury. They have the right to appeal that conviction. That's the way the legal system works.
If the executive gets to step in and decide who is guilty and who goes free, regardless of what juries or courts determine, then we're one step closer to being a tyranny where there is no justice.
Let the courts do their jobs, and stop second-guessing juries based on what the media tells you to believe.
2006-08-27 07:12:32 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 6⤋
No, Bush shouldn't and he won't.....They were not wrongly convicted....Were you in the jury? They heard all the evidence and were still found guilty by a jury of there peers....Get over it!
2006-08-27 07:36:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋