The Anti-Bully! ; )
2006-08-27 06:33:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Helzabet 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
If you see Him as a terrorist, then He is a terrorist to you.
You can call Him anything you want.
There are some people that call this a terrorist.
From the day you were born he was with you.
He was there even before you were born.
If you become an astronaut and hurtle through the vast darkness of space he is there with you.
If you dive deep into the oceans of the world his presence is there.
There is nowhere you can go, nothing you can do to escape him.
He does make a strange sound perhaps you have heard it, Tick-tock, tick-tock.
2006-08-27 13:41:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by chris p 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
impotent. The definition of terrorist is one who terrorizes. Either he will terrorize or he will identify with terrorists and accomplish nothing. A man who argues for terrorism but does not perform any terrorist acts is just as guilty as the aggressors because he encourages aggression. Still qualifies as an act of terrorism in my book.
http://judgeright.blogspot.com
2006-08-27 13:35:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is this a riddle because the definition you described does not fit in the terrorist paradigm?
2006-08-27 13:36:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Love of Truth 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pacifist
2006-08-27 13:38:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Confused?
2006-08-27 13:31:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Frenchy
2006-08-27 13:32:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Stan the answer Man 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Retired?
2006-08-27 15:20:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ineffective
2006-08-27 13:32:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by thewolfskoll 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't consider that person a terrorist. They have strayed away from terrorism.
LEARN ⺠BOND ⺠PRAISE ⺠SHARE ⺠DO
2006-08-27 13:31:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
not a terrorist because the definition of terrorist is one who uses terror.
2006-08-27 13:31:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋