I agree that the histories of each religion should be taught, but not their political or organizational applications. In an ideal world, learning about others' religions would allow us to better understand one another, as human beings, and to find some common ground. Unfortunately, I don't see that it will work in practice because of the state the world is in today. The "my religion is right, yours is wrong" mentality is way too established and people (in general) are too closed off to others' religions or spiritual paths. This may, in part, have to do with these fundamental types who take religion to the extremes and terrorize others...In the name of religion. I was taught from an early age to study ALL religions, then make my own choice, but in the end, I chose none as my own and accepted all as equal, with something to teach *me* about myself and the world around me.
2006-08-27 02:41:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Companion Wulf 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think that religion should be taught after the age of 18. At that age, they can judge what is good and in which religion, if there is any ! Otherwise we will not be teaching religion to the children but influencing their immature minds to accept what we want to teach them. This should be a universal phenomenon.
2006-08-27 02:54:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by jikg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Religions principles of each religion of the world should be taught so that we can better understand what we have and don't have in common. If we understood more then maybe there would be not be as much war as there has been. Also, the history of religious wars should be taught. So we could see what brought them on and maybe prevent them from happening in the future.
2006-08-27 02:47:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Aliz 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was taught about what part religion played in history class. I do not want the version of history that religion gives, or the opinion of that organization. Only the part it played, not the religion itself.
Ex: Islam was used to found an empire. NOT: Islam believes this and that.
2006-08-27 02:33:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
There should be classes in world religions. It should not be a required course though. By teaching about the different religions hopefully this was teach people tolerance of different believes.
2006-08-27 03:04:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by lady01love 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there's a distinction between understanding and believing. Evolution is a medical concept which does no longer contain any specific perception. even if in case you think in Creationism, you're extra effective knowledgeable in case you recognize what the thought of evolution is. And, on the different, i think that persons might desire to recognize the structures and tenets of diverse religions, even if if or no longer they think them. those ARE taught interior the wide-spread public colleges, usually interior the classic heritage classes. inspite of the undeniable fact that, because of the fact the different answerer mentioned, there are too many faiths to incorporate each little thing in a public college curriculum without offending somebody. additionally, our shape supplies for the separation of church and state, so faith won't be in a position to be lined in a public college curriculum.
2016-11-05 21:17:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, its dangerous and would be biased. remember, book are written by people and the committes which approve them are also people, susceptible of being influenced by lobbies (and u know who has the money).
but a subject which teaches modern society, focusing on cultures and lifestyles, that would be a major improvement. or even making students do a small dissertation in a religion of their choice, with a presentation, ensuring all religions are represented.
2006-08-27 03:13:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think all religions should be taught-at a basic level because, as you say, it has changed our history so much. I do not think it should go deep enough into each religion to reach the fundamental element of it--just the basics.
And, most of our forefathers were Deists--------not Christians. They believed in G-d, but not a specific religion.
2006-08-27 02:35:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Shossi 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Separation of church and state has a real basis in allowing for a free and open vote. Teaching of religion used to be handled in the churches themselves, but has fallen flat with the reduction of congregations in churches. The schools are not the best place for replacing this education. They are meant to be social, not political or religious.
2006-08-27 02:36:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by jmmevolve 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think all over the world a basic knowledge of each religion & culture should be given to the students so that they understand that there are people different than themselves & its important that each different community & culture is respected.
2006-08-27 02:42:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ms_4peace 5
·
0⤊
0⤋