No, I have no idea what you mean.
2006-08-27 00:48:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by rhymingron 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry, but did I miss the meeting where Pat Robertson was giving out free crack cocaine for a $20 love gift? This guy sounds like he just shot an 8-ball into his carotid artery.
Oh wait- is he speaking in tongues? Is that it?
That last line, with the "advice." Does ANYONE know what this guy is talking about? I was amused by the first question he asked, but now I think I'm enabling some sort of retarded sea otter with a WiFi connection, who's just banging on the keyboard to open up a clam or something.
Maybe I've fallen asleep, and I'm dreaming this. You know, where you dream and things seem normal but then suddenly the lady you were talking to is a chicken and you're going downstairs in Kirk Douglas' pool because you keep hearing there's a watch down there made from real teeth.
Anyway, I'm going to bed. Someone please take the otter's keyboard away and put a helmet on him so he doesn't hurt himself.
2006-08-27 07:56:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Johnny Tezca 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is very difficult to try and draw a parallel between automotive engineering and intelligent design--believe me, I've tried it in college courses.
The biggest problems with your logic are that cars are *not* simple, and we continue to say that it has a designer when it becomes complex. Not only is this logical from the standpoint of complexity, but we also know for a fact that the BMW designer is a guy named Chris Bangle. He certainly exists, so no one can claim that a complex BMW has no designer.
Now, I realize you're probably being sarcastic, so I just want to assure you that I dislike Chris Bangle's designs just as much as the next guy. This has nothing to do with any emotional reactions, I'm merely being fair.
2006-08-27 07:57:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by giovanni9686 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you gave life to cars?
No, humans will say it has a designer - this time because we have records.
If we did not, we would get mighty suspicious about the fossil record.
However, remember that this is not about 'advancement' or 'complexity' - what it needs is a cyclic interaction with the environment. It needs to live.
2006-08-27 07:49:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
YAWN dude. You've already asked this question. Now, you need to read up on evolution because you'll probably get some answers about it. You can't MAKE anyone believe something. We all have "free will" so stop trying to impose your religion on others. And by the way, I'm not an atheist but I don't try to impose my beliefs onto others. That's "invading" their space.
2006-08-27 07:56:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Honestly, that's the most feeble argument for Creationism I've ever heard.
Feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeble!
2006-08-27 07:54:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by St. Hell 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who? What? Where!
Oh yeah, BMWs are great. Yep.
2006-08-31 00:14:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by MotorCityMadman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
blah blah blah.......... what..........are.............. you............ talk........ing..........about. Are you tryin to put down George Bush?!?!? If so, I dislike the Bush-man too Im so confused...
2006-08-27 07:52:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What???
2006-08-27 07:48:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by E-Fox 6
·
0⤊
0⤋