Try, all religions are right based on the individual perception of what right is. The conflict arises when one right is imposed on another right.
2006-08-27 00:46:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Religion is only faith, intuition and belief. IF you are really honest about it, you can't prove that God does or does not exists. (I am an Agnostic). Most religions have a lot in common, in that they teach us moral structures and how to deal with what comes our way in life. Therefore they are not necessarily wrong, if you think of the lessons they give you as metaphorical. What is wrong is the way most religions insist that theirs is the only way. If there is a God, there are many paths to God, and they don't involve killing people who don't agree with your set of beliefs.
2006-08-27 00:53:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Zelda Hunter 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Look up the term spiritual blindness.
Think about this, Did you ever consider that there are people on this planet that see relevant things that you do not.
If someone were to tell me that people were seeing things that I don't, with my sense of humor I would ask, "well what kind of drugs are they on?", or, " Which mental facility do they attend?"
That is why I use the term relevant.
Jesus talked about people walking around in spiritual blindness, and now as a Christian I see exactly what he was talking about.
WAKE UP!
2006-08-27 01:31:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by theodore r 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. As you communicate about, the state of religion on earth makes it notably not likely that all of us of them should be the genuine faith. I recommend, if one faith extremely had God in its nook, would not the entire international beat a route to its church homes? Any connection with "faith" less than means the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) it is my common sense about this . . . faith tries to position declare to God. This insistence on exclusivity contraptions up religions for rivalry except or till they convert the entire international – thereby eliminating the competition. it is the reason, i believe, those religions watch for the end-time at the same time as God will finally do the eliminating. that's a forgone end that no unmarried faith (a lot less, denomination!) will win the international by technique of itself. in spite of each and everything, they have had between a million,four hundred and three,500 years (Islam and Judaism, respectively) to finish that and have not made any authentic progression. Christianity, with over 2 billion adherents, leads the %. yet Islam, at a million.3 billion, is drawing near solid (back). regardless of being many centuries older than Christianity or Islam, Judaism has purely 14 million adherents. If ANY faith extremely is the right one, i don't believe the competition ought to have survived this lengthy. Given all this . . . how are we meant to ascertain which faith, if any, is ideal? I recommend, extremely!! the first one? the most important one? the most state-of-the-artwork one? the most sensible one? What? the competition reduces our decision to a roll of the dice. And we will visit hell for figuring out on the incorrect one? that's ridiculous. Can God extremely be so sadistic? And if so, why ought to you worship him? No . . . NO faith should be valid if God exists AND is sturdy. Any entity who ought to create the universe, would not be so petty as to ascertain his "smart" beings for condemnation. Why ought to the author supply us free decision, purely to confuse the determination of author? I say that if God exists, ALL religions are heretical. If God is sturdy, we would not be killing one yet another in His call. contained in the paraphrased words of Stephen Roberts: "I contend that we are both anti-faith. I basically believe in a unmarried fewer faith than you do. once you already comprehend why you brush off all the different a threat religions, you'll comprehend why I brush off yours." i believe God ought to, or may, exist; yet i'm particular that NO faith is valid.
2016-10-15 21:44:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
F the holey scriptures,it's how you are not how you read. no I cannot prove my faith is correct but ther are a bunch of blood thirsty proddy bastages that are sure they can while eternally coming up with gibber jabber and pointing to proof in what is unproven.
2006-08-27 02:53:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
How can religion be wrong if according to you, there's no true religion??? If there's no true religion, then it really doesn't matter, does it? It looks to me like you answered your own question!!
2006-08-27 00:47:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Religfions are not all wrong. All of them give some degree of comfort to those who practise them. I thinkit is impossible to prove " faith" ,
2006-08-27 00:54:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's not about 'proving' - it's about oppressing, torturing, manipulating and subverting the masses into being too scared to deny that said religion is the one true faith...
2006-08-27 00:49:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by 8Dave 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
The only wrong religions are those that create divisions, teach hatred for those of other beliefs, and promote fear and guilt among its members.
2006-08-27 00:49:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Watching Krow 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
All religions try to inspire men to be good. But they were created by men.
2006-08-27 00:54:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by elgil 7
·
0⤊
1⤋