The Christ of the Bible's OT is a Sign from the Lord Himself, and the Lord Himself named him Immanuel.
A Gospel angel in Joseph's dream changes the name of the son of the virgin and turns him into the son of a pagan God, Zeus, who would crucify his son and have the child's mother placed in suspicion of adultery, by this Joseph who is nowhere in the OT.
The Command of the Lord Himself is made into a fable that comes straight out of Greek mythology, with Zeus, God of Gods and Father of Gods and men, appearing in a dream as an "Angel" to make Christ his son of and to make Christ's mother equal with Caesar's mother who is impregnated by Zeus to produce a Son of God, since only such men are worthy of leadership in the World of pagans.
For Muslims, Isa was born of the virgin in the Quran as the Scripture before Quran commanded, without father or crucifixion, and without the slander of adultery on his mother, and Isa is as different from Jesus, as Jesus is from Christ or Immanuel.
2006-08-26
23:47:54
·
12 answers
·
asked by
mythkiller-zuba
6
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Catholics worship the Cross and the Pope and the priests, and the virgin statue, and a million other statues, and will never know the difference between JeZeus and Christ and are among the blind. deaf and dumb that Christ will disown on the Day of Judgment.
Catholics are denied their power of intellect by a celibate leadership that never experienced love for their fellow men in their unnatural lives that deny women their role as mothers and themselves fatherhood, which, consequently remove love from their heart, and they can only envy and destroy.
Catholics imagine that they love the crucified thieves named Jesus by Pontius Pilate.
2006-08-26
23:59:05 ·
update #1
Quran never uses Jesus.
The Quran you know is a King James Version of the Quran by the false sheikhs and Imams of the Middle East, where the Curse of the Crucified Thieves Jesus keep them off the Path that is Straight and Narrow.
2006-08-27
00:01:59 ·
update #2
Do you know that the difference between Christ of the Old Testament and Christ of the New Testament is Jesus, because Jesus only makes and appearance in the New Testament and never appears in the Old testament just as Jesus never appears in the Quran?
And do you know that Jesus of the New Testament is as different from Isa al Masih of the Quran as he is from Christ of the Old Testament?
You are too blind to see that questions are constrained by the limit of characters and you are too dumb to understand a shortened answere or pretending to be too dumb because you are hurt by the question.
Ther is more cinfusion in the Bible tha in a million shortened answers in Yahoo Answers and you are not smart enought to understand this.
There is aname for a false argument that is too weak to confront the question and chooses to attack other than the question.
But you have yourself to deal with for your weakness in spite of your weakness.
Truth offends but will not be compromised.
2006-08-27
00:12:15 ·
update #3
We can say Jesus or Isa, both are the same persons. Go through Quran and you will find the fact and there will be no confusion in your mind. According to Quran birth of Isa was an example for the masses, that Allah can do anything. Jesus was just a messanger he never said to worship him. How can we creat idols of those whome we have never saw.And above all there is not sign in the Bible too which signals to worship Jesus
2006-08-26 23:55:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by eitemad_eitemad 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The last Old Testament book was written at least 100 years before the birth of Christ, so Joseph would not be in the Old testament since he was not a diety that could transcend both the Old and New Testaments.
[Is 7:14] Therefore the Lord himself will give you this sign: the virgin shall be with child, and bear a son, and shall name him Immanuel.
Footnote:
[1] The sign proposed by Isaiah was concerned with the preservation of Judah in the midst of distress (cf Isaiah 7:15,17), but more especially with the fulfillment of God's earlier promise to David (2 Sam 7:12-16) in the coming of Immanuel (meaning, "With us is God") as the ideal king (cf Isaiah 9:5-6; 11:1-5). The Church has always followed St. Matthew in seeing the transcendent fulfillment of this verse in Christ and his Virgin Mother. The prophet need not have known the full force latent in his own words; and some Catholic writers have sought a preliminary and partial fulfillment in the conception and birth of the future King Hezekiah, whose mother, at the time Isaiah spoke, would have been a young, unmarried woman (Hebrew, almah). The Holy Spirit was preparing, however, for another Nativity which alone could fulfill the divinely given terms of Immanuel's mission, and in which the perpetual virginity of the Mother of God was to fulfill also the words of this prophecy in the integral sense intended by the divine Wisdom.
2006-08-26 23:57:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Robert L 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The O.T. only refers to the coming of a messiah. It goes into great detail on the signs of his coming. Examples: the lineage, virgin birth etc. But John 1:1 (New International Version)
New International Version (NIV)
Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society says
John 1
The Word Became Flesh
1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
telling us that The Christ was always with God. The N.T. then goes on to explain the Jesus is this messiah. He was from the house of David of a virgin birth and the many stories pointing to his being. He was god because only God can forgive sin. In Matthew 9:6 it states But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins...." Then he said to the paralytic, "Get up, take your mat and go home."
It is hard to understand about the trilogy of God, God the father, God the son and God the holy spirit but remember we have two parts to us. We have to physical part and we have the soul. The soul can and does exist after death so why can't God have three parts separate from each and together as a whole.
I can quote from the bible all day long but I hope this helps alittle if you want to talk more on the subject you can contact me through my email amasonjr58@yahoo.com
2006-08-27 00:21:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by art m 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You Muslims always ask this kind of question in pretense as to show your self-proclaimed righteousness, thinking others are so fool, while ignoring your terroristic nature in your very own tenet.
Let's see the answer of your question that had been answered by the same person (yourself):
"For Muslims, Isa was born of the virgin in the Quran as the Scripture before Quran commanded, without father or crucifixion, and without the slander of adultery on his mother, and Isa is as different from Jesus, as Jesus is from Christ or Immanuel"
The essence of your message indicates that your version of Isa is plainly different from the other party's Jesus.
While your Isa is just a small matter of accessories that was manipulated and twisted by Islam the way it likes to encourages violence, hates, spites, terror as 'normal' values and idealism, the Christian's Jesus has just the opposite natures.
2006-08-27 00:15:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by sbbb l 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Christ of the Old Testament is the same as the New Testament Christ.
Seems like you are totally confused. Read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation. You will see Christ in all the books and fully revealed in the New Testament.
2006-08-27 00:30:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by P P 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm an atheist, yet, after having study the Bible assorted situations, i've got grown to dislike the theory that the previous testomony God is a lot diverse from the recent testomony God. interior the OT, God isn't "wrathful, violent, tyrannical" as such countless of my fellow atheists declare. He genuinely helped the Israelites against their Canaanite foes, yet what might you do in the journey that your associates had to ravage your cities. The OT regulations of Deuteronomy, nonetheless genuinely unacceptable in at present's greater "civilized" society, have been the norm back interior the olden days of the classic Hebrews and, as a result, must be seen in a acceptable context. whether, the OT God grow to be additionally merciful, from listening to the cries of his human beings and helping them to even forgiving King David of his crime of homicide/adultery. sufficient of that, shifting directly to the recent testomony. Christians delight in picturing Jesus as an entire guy of peace and love. in spite of the certainty that he genuinely did sell a popular message of peace, there are a number of "perplexing sayings" that should make some human beings scratch their heads. working example, he reminds us that many go the line to damnation. Ooh, frightening, no longer very "loving" inspite of each and everything. With love, an atheist
2016-09-30 22:49:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is obvious by your "question" that you are totally confused. Jesus is the same in the New and Old Testament, just known by different names. As for the Quran, it is an evil book full of lies as its auther was shown to be during those days it was written.
2006-08-26 23:53:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by child_of_the_lion 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Jesus is Christ the son of God almightly
2006-08-27 00:03:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Y'know...really, sometimes it would better if you just went back to your little chair in the corner and sat there muttering to yourself like usual, rather than share your "thoughts" on here...
Doncha think?
2006-08-26 23:59:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by St. Hell 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
For us Catholic, Jesus Christ is the same always. He is unchanging.
2006-08-26 23:50:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by WC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋