English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-26 23:21:17 · 3 answers · asked by sarah s 1 in Environment

3 answers

Answerer 1 apparently interprets the question to apply only to the U.S. Since the nonrenewable energy limit is a world problem, I'd agree on the population limitation idea, but immigration is irrelevant. We'd also need serious recycling, not the token stuff we mostly do now, and be prepared to accept a lot of things most of us don't think necessary yet, such as more nuclear power, invasive wind and solar projects, and fossil fuel rationing.

2006-08-29 04:35:24 · answer #1 · answered by kirchwey 7 · 0 0

Yes. We can also work on not having so many kids and cut down on so much immigration.

2006-08-27 06:28:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

yes, but we have to find a way to meter the "free" energy first

2006-08-28 22:21:09 · answer #3 · answered by Michael S 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers