"Big bang" or Big lie?

Question

How can evolutionists and atheists so easily accept a theory that says a giant rock exploded and created billions of symmetrical and geometrical planets. how can a design so structured, complex, and artistic happen by mere chance. It is like saying the paint for the Mona Lisa suddenly splashed on a canvas and created a masterpiece by chance or accident. Explain how there is design from that of atoms and ecosystems to constellation and galaxies Just because you cannot see God doesnt mean he is not alive. Can you see gravity. To discredit an infinite God you would have to infinite knowledge of an infinite universe. God is too great to rationalize and man is too pridefull to admit he doesn't know it all.

Answer 1

Agreed

Answer 2

I don't belive in the Big Bang. Not for the same reasons you have. It is aparent that you do not know what the Big Bang is.

It was not a giant rock. LOL
It did not create symmetrical and geometrical planets.
The universe is not structured or artistic. Complex? Maybe.
I can see how gravity works, I cannot see any evidence of God.
Infinite God? Give a good definition and I can disprove it.
Are you to prideful to admit you do not know about the Big Bang.

I am an atheist the understands evolution, but I DO NOT support the Big Bang Theory.

Answer 3

oh please, the mathematics are far too complicated for about 99.99% of the world to understand, but in short, because there is proof. if you accept the force of gravity, and the laws of physics, that would explain to formation of the planets and stars. and considering that the universe has had billions and billions of years to evolve and change, it's no surprise tthings have gotten complicated. and the argumetns against god generally consist of something along the lines of questioning why an infinitely powerful god who hates evil still allows evil to take place. or else why his representatives on earth often seem to be selfish, corrupt, immoral people. we can very easily admit not knowing it all, scientists (people who pursue real truth) do it all the time. what religious nuts like you cannot accept is that the world is too complicated to be explained away by saying, oh god made it this way so it must be right. it would be just pathetic if you people didn't try to force your excuses on the rest of us

Answer 4

First, you should educate yourself on a topic before forming an opinion or commenting ... the Big Bang does not involve "a giant rock".

Second, while gravity cannot be "seen" it can definitely be observed.

Thirdly, while I am confident we will (after some adjustments) show proof of the concept of evolution, I am not convinced sufficiently of the Big Bang. The two are completely different.

Lack of evidence against is not proof. Belief in a divine being due to inability to comprehend the workings of the universe is a rash assumption without any supportive evidence.

Answer 5

a big bang in its essence is a theory develop by man in order to understand what had happened to the universe aeons prior to us typing in front of our computers trying to answer this question of yours. the theory might be wrong or might be right. however, you who do not know the theory for well is discrediting yourself by asking this question while not knowing the very least to make an argument.

do not compare mona lisa with the big bang as both have no connection whatsoever with each other. juz because you do not know how it was constructed, you could compare it with the big bang theory.

we have no definite way to prove exactly what happened billion years ago but scientists have tried to come up with a theory with their own evidence gathered to try to tell us how it might have happened.

Answer 6

BIG THEORY! I will say however, I have yet to see an Ark or a Holy Grail! As a matter of fact, I haven't seen one iota of proof of creation other than evolution itself! Ive seen tons of dinosaur bones, Dead cavemen with apelike features and tools by their side, Gazed at infinite stars and galaxies, watched babies evolve form embryos to adults, seen frogs born out of the norm with three legs, I could go on forever but your last statement answers your own question! Man is TOO arrogant in his thinking of how God created! NO man understands the power and ability of the ALMIGHTY! Maybe he used what we call evolution as his method? The bible is merely a very contradictive story of right from wrong! God did not right it! Man did in his arrogant yet stupid understanding of the Lord! You people seem to tailor God into what you want him to be!

Answer 7

Virtually all scientists that subscribe to evolution (and that's perhaps 98% that believe in evolution) also do not believe they "know it all." You have assumed many false things, among them (hypocritcally?) that only others assume false things. Evolution does not treat the matter of "an infinite God." It is only informed speculation about the origins of life and of the physical universe. "God" is a matter much more complex and mysterious. Evolution and atheism are two entirely different concepts. (Not merely comparing "apples and organges," but rather more like comparing apples and eternity.)

Answer 8

YOu have NO understanding of the Big Bang theory.

Go read wikipedia or a book or ANYTHING.

It has nothing to do with exploding rocks.

Jeesh.....

From wikipedia (if you can read, and not just spout what others have told you):

The theory is based on the observed expanding of space (in accord with the Friedmann-Lemaître model of general relativity) as indicated by the Hubble redshift of distant galaxies taken together with the cosmological principle.

Extrapolated into the past, these observations show that the universe has expanded from a state in which all the matter and energy in the universe was at an immense temperature and density. Physicists do not widely agree on what happened before this, although general relativity predicts a gravitational singularity (for reporting on some of the more notable speculation on this issue, see cosmogony).

The term Big Bang is used both in a narrow sense to refer to a point in time when the observed expansion of the universe (Hubble's law) began — calculated to be 13.7 billion (1.37 × 1010) years ago (±2%) — and in a more general sense to refer to the prevailing cosmological paradigm explaining the origin and expansion of the universe, as well as the composition of primordial matter through nucleosynthesis as predicted by the Alpher-Bethe-Gamow theory.

From this model, George Gamow in 1948 was able to predict, at least qualitatively, the existence of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB).[2] The CMB was discovered in the 1960s and further validated the Big Bang theory over its chief rival, the steady state theory.

The Big Bang theory developed from observations and theoretical considerations. Observationally, it was determined that most spiral nebulae were receding from Earth, but those who made the observation weren't aware of the cosmological implications, nor that the supposed nebulae were actually galaxies outside our own Milky Way.[3] In 1927, Georges Lemaître, a Roman Catholic priest, independently derived the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker equations from Albert Einstein's equations of general relativity and proposed, on the basis of the recession of spiral nebulae, that the universe began with the "explosion" of a "primeval atom"—what was later called the Big Bang.[4]

In 1929, Edwin Hubble provided an observational basis for Lemaître's theory. He discovered that, seen from Earth, light from other galaxies is red-shifted in direct proportion to their distance from the Earth. This fact is now known as Hubble's law. Given the cosmological principle whereby the universe, when viewed on sufficiently large distance scales, has no preferred directions or preferred places, Hubble's law suggested that the universe was expanding, contradicting the infinite and unchanging static universe scenario developed by Einstein.

Answer 9

If you think it was a "giant rock" or that planets are "symmetrical and geometrical," you have no idea what you are talking about. You might actually want to read a little bit about astronomy before you dismiss it. You might learn something.

Answer 10

The big bang theory defies the theory of thermodynamics, yet thermodynamics has never been disproved yet (oh apart from the big bang)