English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/07/0722_040722_gayanimal.html

2006-08-26 13:14:55 · 23 answers · asked by Hoolahoop 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Nikki, that isn't the point. The point is that Christians argue that homosexuality isn't natural, that it's a product of warped society, clearly it's found in nature also, do you think the bonobos in the garden of eden were queer or did that just happen after the fall?

2006-08-26 13:21:31 · update #1

oki, no I don't, not at all. I think all of us, regardless of sexual orientation are "beasts". I'm challenging ideas of "natural and unnatural."

2006-08-26 13:24:11 · update #2

Funny how Mia thinks I'm gay!

2006-08-26 13:26:14 · update #3

There are Christians who argue, based on the "evidence" of nature, that sex is a purely a reproductive heterosexual affair. There's a lot of masturbation goes on in the natural world, Bonobos even make dildos!

Anyway didn't God make all these animals like this?

2006-08-26 13:30:01 · update #4

Remind me to give Annie Bee the points! Do you know the rooster song
We had some chickens, no eggs would they lay
Had some chickens, no eggs would they lay
My wife said, Honey, this sure ain't funny
We're losing money, no eggs will they lay
Then a rooster came into our yard
Caught them chickens off their guard
They're laying eggs now like they never used to
Since the rooster came into our yard

Had some milk cows, no milk would they give
We had milk cows, no milk would they give
My wife said, Honey, this sure ain't funny
We're losing money, no milk will they give
Then a rooster came into our yard
Caught them milk cows off their guard
They're giving egg-nog like they never used to
Since the rooster came into our yard

Had some elephants, no tusks would they grow
We had elephants, no tusks would they grow
My wife said, Honey, this sure ain't funny
We're losing money, no tusks will they grow
Then a rooster came into our yard (- with a ladder!)
...

2006-08-26 13:34:57 · update #5

23 answers

Animals are not gay. They do those things to show they are the alpha males and have power over the weaker. It isn't sexual.

2006-08-26 13:18:30 · answer #1 · answered by JENNLUPE 4 · 2 4

... and every christian who believes that what is "unnatural" is wrong for humans should stop driving cars, flying in planes, wearing make-up, talking on phones, using computers, and vacuuming their homes.

Those Christians only want HOMOSEXUALS to live "naturally," not the entire world. That argument always shows it's complete lack of honesty... especially when seen on a computer screen having been sent over the Internet. How insincere can an argument get?

2006-08-26 20:50:11 · answer #2 · answered by Dustin Lochart 6 · 0 1

We had gay roosters years ago. One was Bi, he would jump anything. Also had a big old duck that had a thing for any barnyard critter that wasn't a duck. He even went after the cat, and the turkey knocked him for a loop.
I'm really not kidding. Our kids were nearing their teens and secretly (HA) called him a Ducker the ******. I guess we should have called him a Universal Lover.
Humans are born the way they are, period, to force them to be anything else is unnatural.

2006-08-26 20:28:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

How do people know that animals do not have souls? Jack & Rexella Van Impe say that our pets will be in heaven!

As for animals being gay, does this now mean that there are sinful and righteous animals (with or without salvation)?

Below is Dr. Van Impe's site link with the information they talked about on their Christian show.

2006-08-26 20:27:24 · answer #4 · answered by LaRue 4 · 1 0

They ignore it just like they do all science that does not reflect and/or support their beliefs.

There may be some who make excuses or offer their own (unscientific) explanation but most will shrug off the facts and make comments like 'they don't have souls' 'animals are exempt' etc.

2006-08-26 20:21:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Okay first animals do have souls. Secondly I think it is natuaral you can't resist you urges to much. We have the urge to live dont we. thirdly it isn't a birth defect. ithink it is natural and that it is there to prevent over population

2006-08-26 20:31:52 · answer #6 · answered by TheWonderer878398 3 · 0 0

hey jennlupe, does this mean I should take a man from behind to prove I am the alpha male? Seems kind of determental to proving one is a dominant MALE. Physical non-sexual domination would work much better.

2006-08-26 20:21:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Uhm, what animals are "gay"? Besides, they are probably just experimenting.

You can't label them for something that happened one time in uncle Rob's basement on halloween.

Honestly, spot didn't mean to break his uncle's bottle of fancy lotion.

2006-08-26 20:26:26 · answer #8 · answered by TonerLow69 3 · 3 0

I think that's unatural and sickening and since they dont have souls it's probably ok but they didnt know they just imitated what the sick people of today do they dont know it's a sin they probably dont even know what a sin is so it doesn'tmatter unless you want to make me barf.

2006-08-26 20:37:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You shouldn't say all Christians think that way.
I've seen plenty of things where it seems to be caused by too much estrogen in utero for male children and too much testosterone in utero for female children. That isn't a choice, it's a defect.
How I see it is, God obviously doesn't like men laying with men and women laying with women, so whether it's a choice or not, they are just supposed to resist the urges, because they are not right.

2006-08-26 20:18:46 · answer #10 · answered by redeye.treefrog 3 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers