The Carbon dating is ever in refinement .. We are told we owe "scientific method" to Roger Bacon .. and that Roger Bacon in return derived the idea from dervhish techniques he learned in Damascus ..
So for me the beauty of "science" is that it is an unending question mark .. A neverending inquiry always improving on itself .. The "Democracy" of John Stuart Mills once also had this virtue organised for entire societies .. to listen and value a voice of dissent in the ranks ... Such is the stuff of selfimproving .. whether carbondating pollen in the shroud of Turin .. Evaluating the size and eccentricity of a planetoid's orbit .. or questioning if free thought is getting stagnant in a congregation saying "ramen" ...
It would be wonderful if our news day was the current debates in selfimproving sciences .. arguing if hydrogen tanked from space for fuel cells might lead to less greenhouse gases .. rather than wars and militarism ... and new differences between peoples who fail to "hear" one another well ...
2006-08-26 12:11:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by gmonkai 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
You better watch out. The Flying Spaghetti Monster Eating Monster is coming for you.
2006-08-26 16:30:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
THERE IS NO "CARBON-DATING", TCHOK!
TO EVEN SPEAK THE WORD IS BLASPHEMOUS TO OUR NOODLEDGE, THE MOST NOODLY UPON HIGH, THE FSM!(PBUHNA)FOR TO PROVE HIM WRONG, IS TO PROVE HIM RIGHT! THAT IS THE GET-OUT CLAUSE-ERM, I MEAN, TRUTH!!!!
WHERE IS YOUR FAITH BROTHER, HAVE YOU BEEN TEMPTED BY THE ANTIPASTAFARIAN TEACHINGS OF "NEW SCIENTIST" AND THOSE SILLY INCONVENIENCES THAT ARE FACTS, AGAIN? SIGH, WELL YOU KNOW WHAT YOU MUST DO....WHIP YOURSELF PURE AGAIN WITH UNCOOKED SPAGHETTI UNTIL THE SAUCE MOST HOLY SPILLS FROM YOUR WANTON BODY. DON'T FORGET A PINCH OF SALT FOR TASTE. ONIONS ARE NICE TOO. OOH, AND MUSHROOMS, DON'T FORGET THE MUSHROOMS!
PRAISE THE FSM(PBUHNA)FOR SENDING ME TO SHOW YOU YOUR ERROR, BROTHER, FOR THAT IS WHAT HE HAS DONE! FOR I DID SPY A STRING OF SPAGHETTI NOT TWENTY DAYS AGO, IN THE SHAPE OF A LETTER, NOT SURE WHICH ONE, EXACTLY, IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN AN 'S' OR AN 'N'...ACTUALLY, IT COULD EVEN HAVE BEEN A 'Z', IF I HAD BROUGHT A MIRROR...ANYWAY, I DIGRESS. THE POINT IS, IS THAT THAT SIGN MEANT I SHOULD COME ON HERE(THERE ARE LETTERS HERE, YOU SEE? AHAA!)AND WAIT UNTIL THE MOMENT I WAS SUMMONED HERE FOR! THAT TIME HAS COME, EVENTUALLY...!!! PRAISE THE FSM!!!!(PBUHNA)!!!
YOU MUST PRAY HE SHALL BLIND YOU TO THE TORMENT OF RATIONAL THOUGHT, FOR IT IS THE ANTIPASTA OF ALL THE FSM'S(PBUHNA) HARD WORK. MONEY DOESN'T GROW ON TREE'S, YOU KNOW! ALTHOUGH THE PRIESTS, AS YOU KNOW, ARE STILL CONSULTING THE FSM(PBUHNA)ON THAT ONE...I AM CONFIDENT THE FSM(PBUHNA) SHALL HEAR OUR PRAYERS, FOR IT IS THE WILL OF THE FSM(PBUHNA) THAT WE PRAY FOR STUFF WE WANT.
PLEASE BROTHER, DESIST FROM THINKING FOR YOURSELF, FOR THAT IS THE JOB OF OUR MOST HOLY HOST, THE FSM(PBUHNA)ONLY HE KNOWS EVERYTHING, SO WE DO NOT HAVE TO!!! BLESS HIS SOCKS OF COTTON AND PETITE STATURE!!!
NOW I MUST GO.
THE NURSE WILL BE COMING SOON WITH MY PILL AND I MUST USE ALL MY CONSENTRATION TO NOT THINK IMPURE THOUGHTS AS I LEER AT HER CLEAVAGE.
RAMEN, TO YOU BROTHER IN SPAGHETTI (PBUP), MAY THE SAUCE BE WITH YOU.
PS: PLEASE EXCUSE THE CAPS, I SIMPLY WANTED TO BLEND IN.
2006-08-26 19:56:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by googlywotsit 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope, it was the flying spaghetti monster's sauce that still has enough electromagnetic enegry to effect the needle. or, it could be that carbon dating was man made and says that a LIVE clam is millions of years old.
2006-08-26 16:32:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I just have to wonder, of all the people who deny carbon dating, how many of them even know how it works?
And we will never know if His Noodliness messes with the carbon dating machines =) You know what they say...with FSM, all things are possible!
RAmen!
2006-08-26 19:27:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by ♥Mira♥ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Carbon dating is very inaccurate. There was this volcanic rock who the scientist knew it was only 50 years old. They tested it with Carbon Dating and the test showed it was millions and millions of years old. What's up with that!? Carbon dating is not reliable!
2006-08-26 16:27:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by OnFireForJesus! 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
lol! All I can say is, YES. It must be true. Is it in writing? Then it must be true. Thank God some things in writing can be deleted for good. Saves a lot of humiliation! Rock on!
2006-08-26 16:28:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Suspended 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Bible does not teach that the earth is 6000 years old. The bible does not state the age of the earth/ universe.
Rather, the Bible is open to a 4.5 billion year old earth, and 14 billion year old universe.
Cordially,
John
2006-08-26 16:26:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by John 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Your form of Pastafarianism is obselete! I doesn't have enough idolatry! All hail the Flying Macaroni Monster and his macaroni picture IDOLS! POWER TO FMM
2006-08-26 16:26:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
just pass the dutchie, stop hoggin it.
2006-08-26 20:14:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by turtle girl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋