It varied. Most of the younger ones weren't hers by birth, being post menopausal and everything. So they probably didn't have the same father. She was like the Mother Teresa of the shoe world. And it was a really big shoe.
2006-08-26 07:56:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr Know It All 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
She had so many, she didn't know what to do, and, yes, they had the same father.. not like today, when women rarely know WHO the father is because they sleep with ALMOST everybody who'll buy them a beer..
2006-08-26 07:51:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by chuckufarley2a 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Too many to count. I always assumed she adopted them all or something.
2006-08-26 08:47:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Michelle118 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
she had so many children she did'nt know what to do......probably not they were prolly all spread out within the years
2006-08-26 07:50:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A shoefull, and in those days very likely.
2006-08-26 07:50:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by helixburger 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
she had so many she didn't know what to do..............I don't think it states how many she had at all? Does it? Where's my mother goose book?????
2006-08-26 09:12:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by stuffyluvbug 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it were thirteen, just one would have been too much.
2006-08-26 07:51:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by kaththea s 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
she had so many she didn't know what to do.
2006-08-26 07:50:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by CC 1
·
0⤊
0⤋