How about in Syria as well?
(I cannot believe I actually capitalized the first letters for syria and iran)
2006-08-26 03:27:45 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Undoubtedly, their belligerence will get them in hot water with someone. What is so funny about the new found partnership of syria and iran, is syria. This punk @ss dweeb, who took over daddy's job, assad, has always been happy with his clandestine maneuvers from inside his borders. You always new the turkey necked bastard was up to no good, but the solid evidence was evasive, at best.
Now, he has a good buddy, armedineejad, to help bully the entire region, so he thinks he can now stand tall, and show the world, what a brave and intimidating warrior, he has become.
Someone very soon is going to kick him so hard, they will both have to go to the hospital to get the kickers foot out of assads @ss!
2006-08-26 03:41:56 · answer #1 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The US has insufficient military reserves to take on Iran, let alone Syria. Syria is run by a dictator that is actually friendly to the US and views terrorists as a threat to HIS regime. Attacking Iran would be nothing like attacking Iraq - it would be hell for the invading troops as the situation in Iran is very different than the situation in Iraq. Iran has also made the claim (which is probably true) that it is has tens of thousands of would-be suicide bombers that they would send to the US to retaliate. Want to screw up this country even more? Have the military invade Iran and watch what happens. Syria also happens to have the largest army in the Middle East. The US could probably take over both countries, but there is no way we could hold and control them, just as there is no way we are controlling Iraq right now.
2006-08-26 10:38:09 · answer #2 · answered by Paul H 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why not?Since US is doing so well in Afghanistan and Iraq...US is spreading democracy and peace,everything is OK there.Let's try to bring some of this in Iran and Syria too...
plsssssss,right now US is not capable of starting another war and a war with Iran would be lost from the start...So no,US should not bomb Iran...
2006-08-30 03:00:13 · answer #3 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why earn more enemies when u have your hands full. In the eyes of the world,America is a big bully ,nosing around in everybody's business. By bombing Iran and syria, the US will only earn more enemies. You should know that there are no real winner in a war.Both sides will have casualties and the real victims will be the civilians. Might is not always right....
2006-08-26 10:36:50 · answer #4 · answered by The Inquisitive 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I say go for it. Since its part of the 'axis of evil' then we should treat it like it is. I don't like war, nor people dieing all over the place, but this slow death march we are doing sucks. All we are going to end up with is a sort of Israel/Palestine conflict that lasts for generations.
I think we should just go all out. I think all it would take is one more incident like Sept 11 and it will REALLY be WW III. As far as the UN and the world community saying anything, they really won't do anything about it. Case in point:Israel Lebanon. UN resolution is passed to stop the war but now no country really wants to send troops to hold the piece.
Give me a break! If I was Israel, I would just go back to fighting.
2006-08-26 11:37:17 · answer #5 · answered by esourcemagazine 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would be great to just annihilate countries that we don't like, but one needs to bear in mind that the entire world doesn't have the same ideology as the people of America do. This is why changing 'Ideologies' is so difficult; because there are some people ; maybe even a very great percentage of the population who's culture revolves around the killing of Westerners. I suggest staying away. There is no reasoning with them. Lord knows we have tried. Talk time is over...bring on the nukes : )))
2006-08-27 17:55:21 · answer #6 · answered by webprancer 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No! Do you know how many children and babies live in Iran! Do you really want them to die?! Because of your bombs?!
It's too dangerous to bomb Iran, because they have powerful weapons they will fight back!
As for Syria.... Leave them alone, what have they done,
2006-08-26 10:34:22 · answer #7 · answered by Miss LaStrange 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
With what armies? We're overtaxed and undermanned. We now have navy and air force personnel being sent to assist army and marine personnel in roles they weren't trained for. I've already seen news reports that show that Iran has more pull in Iraq than the U.S. does. Something we didn't want to happen.
Let's give a big Hooray for Bush's foreign policy!
2006-08-26 10:33:07 · answer #8 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Would you joint the army to carry the burden of fighting? It's easy to say lets bomb here and there while you just sit infront of you PC inside your airconditioned room listening CDs. Talk is cheap man!
2006-08-26 14:36:14 · answer #9 · answered by Bagus R 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
are you crazy....Are you not tired of our soldiers dying ....and the other side their loses ...we bleed the same we hurt we have families that mourn. To attack Iran would be a grave error. We would win but look at all the lives that would be lost.We have some high powered stuff.I heard we have a bomb that sucks all the air out of the atmosphere...surely they do not want to tangle. and we do not either
2006-08-26 10:41:00 · answer #10 · answered by marym 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋