"A Malaysian man was yesterday sentenced to four months in jail with three strokes of the cane for violating the Immigration Act. "
http://www.brudirect.com/DailyInfo/News/Archive/Aug06/230806/nite09.htm
Well, I guess that's telling him!
And no, I don't advocate this. But what penalty for illegal immigration do you think the US should have to serve as a detriment?
2006-08-25 15:58:23 · 10 answers · asked by DAR 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Sorry- to serve as a deterrent.
2006-08-25 15:59:18 · update #1
Enlightenment, I hate to break you away from that story if it is a draw for you, but perhaps you should be in a different forum for that.
2006-08-25 16:06:24 · update #2
OK, Enlightenment, that was funny.
2006-08-25 19:28:15 · update #3
If companies would report illegals who try to get jobs to ICE and ICE would do their job and deport them and their families, I believe THAT would be a deterrent. They would leave on their own as some are already doing.
The government should penalize any company who hires illegals. If a person has no documentation they should not be able te get welfare or any tax paid assistance. If the law would crack down on it, they would go back home or get legal.
2006-08-25 16:16:31 · answer #1 · answered by «»RUBY«» 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I have heard "spare the rod and spoil the child" and in some cases it has meaning.
If nice doesn't work that harder punishment is necessary.
Penalty--Deportation-No aid to any family left behind-all cost to be paid that have occurred by Mexico if deportee or family doesn't pay, than it would be Mexico's problem for further punishment. I hold them accoutable too.
2006-08-25 16:42:47 · answer #2 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i'm no longer a conservative in spite of the shown fact that, so i might in elementary terms answer proper to the morality section. i do no longer think of that morality is unavoidably religious. regularly communities come to have standards of habit that for the period of their minds shelter them and their babies. some you may trust like outlawing pedophilia, some you may unlike homosexuality. Myself i ask your self why government feels the might desire to be in touch in marriage in any respect. It became initially a non secular business enterprise. Institutionalizing a non secular service might seem to circulate against the 1st modification. i think of every physique could have the skill to circulate into any form of settlement they pick and contact it in spite of fits it.
2016-09-30 00:11:12 · answer #3 · answered by armiso 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe we ought to take lessons from Borneo.
2006-08-25 18:23:01 · answer #4 · answered by jack jr 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
So what your saying is...America isn't the only country in the world with immigration laws??
2006-08-25 16:18:27 · answer #5 · answered by yars232c 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes and it is the USA that is supposedly inhuman toward illegals!
2006-08-25 16:02:08 · answer #6 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The U.S. is WAY too SOFT on illegals!!!! That's why we are in this MESS today!!!!
DEPORT ALL ILLEGALS>>>>>>>>>>>>
SUPPORT HR4437
2006-08-25 16:06:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Um, this is JonBenet Ramsey week remember...
OK fine, you know love ya, and am just a sarcastic nerd, I'll play along, here -
SHIP THE ILEEEGELS BACK TO MEXICO AND BACK TO THERE CHIKENS AND THIER DIRTHOLES AND THIER WELFARE TAKING MY WELFARE MY TAX DOLLARS I WORK HARD THEY DONT KILL EM ALL LET DOG SORT EM OUT PROASIE THE MINUTEMEN AND I LOVE ANN COULTER...
huh,huh.... (out of breath)
2006-08-25 16:01:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
a Cain. hell use a whip.
2006-08-25 16:12:09 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow !!
2006-08-25 17:02:43 · answer #10 · answered by hexa 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋