2006-08-25 15:08:22 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I don't know. If Lichtenstein and Kenya went to war...would that mean that there's no peace in Iceland?
2006-08-25 15:14:46 · answer #1 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Victory is the first step to peace. The victory may be achieved through diplomacy or force of arms.
There are consequences to not winning wars. 53 years ago, the UN troops reached a cease fire with the Chinese and North Korean armies in Korea. As a result, North Korea is now a nuclear power and the population is starving.
In contrast, eight years before that, the Allied forces DEFEATED the armies and navies of Germany and Japan. As a result, both nations are highly productive peaceful societies.
2006-08-29 13:52:01 · answer #2 · answered by JAMES11A 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just as peace is the first step to war.
2006-08-25 22:15:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, war is the final step to peace.
2006-08-25 22:11:44 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No because you can have peace without war. Take a look at the democratic peace.
2006-08-25 22:11:21 · answer #5 · answered by loretta 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
War IS peace.
2006-08-25 22:25:01 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obliterating the entire humen race is the first step to peace. As a wise man once said, "No man, no problem"
2006-08-26 00:00:03 · answer #7 · answered by anonymous 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Peace through strength
or
Peace through Superior Firepower
whichever you prefer :)
2006-08-25 22:23:09 · answer #8 · answered by Austin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
War is the opposite of peace, so no.
2006-08-25 22:18:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It was for the United States - remember the Revolutionary War.
It has been for most countries - that which is worth having is worth fighting for. No bully relinquishes power unless you fight back.
2006-08-25 22:26:26 · answer #10 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋