English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
7

do you agree with iran to build,and please dont tell me thats not in their plans....as a country they do have the rite.!!!!but when the iran president openly says that isreal should be wiped off the map,how could you agree with letting them build,muslim does not sound peacful when they say that...are you muslims for iran or against them,its confusing...

2006-08-25 14:14:39 · 15 answers · asked by wzr5gq20032000 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

15 answers

Iran are Muslims...have you noticed this?
Israel has nuclear weapons already and they didn't stop saying that Iran is an enemy for 30 years...Iran also has the right to defend itself and even if they develop nuclear weapons do you think they are stupid to use them against Israel and putting themselves in danger for Israeli/American nuclear blast? It's only a weapon for defense against the continous Israeli threat in the region "Israel has more than 200 nuclear heads"

Why Israel has the right to produce such type of weapons and occupy lands of its neighboring countries..why nobody is asking Israel about its daily crimes against the Palestinians?....why the US always uses Veto against most UN resolutions against Israeli actions?And in the same time no other country in the middle east has the right to have nuclear weapons?how logic.....

Muslims are peaceful toward peaceful people "don't remind me with Bin-Laden actions please because he is the worst example for Muslims who don't understand their religion and he represents the minority of Muslims and not the majority as your media is trying to make you understand" and Israel since its foundation was aggressive and expansive....why do you expect that Muslims should act peacefully towards a nation who kills their brothers since 58 years? Try to see things as a Muslim citizen in the mid-east and you will understand my view better.

2006-08-26 04:23:29 · answer #1 · answered by mido 4 · 5 0

There are Jews who think it would be cool to wipe out all the Muslims (I've seen the claims). But very few peple go along with that either.

Mid-east leaders have a long hisotry of spouting off about who they are tougher than and who is going to lose in the "mother of all wars" (Sadam, Qadaffi). It's mostly posturing for the folks at home.

Of course, you want to check up on this stuff because sometimes they believe their own rhetoric. But overall it's just noise. Iran is one of the most civilized of Islamic countries, one that has a fair history of non-aggression as mid-east countries go (barring a certain Islamic Revolution and that was mostly internal).

My own view is that WMDs should not be accessible to any mid-east country, including Israel and it's 200 to 400 nukes. But reality is what it is. Iran may end up with nukes, and will never use them - whatever they toss out, they know they would get back a hundred times over from the rest of the world.

2006-08-25 21:41:33 · answer #2 · answered by sheeple_rancher 5 · 0 0

yeah well, when its the matter of existence, u even throw a kitchen sink at the enemy. Iran feels any time either usa or israel or them both will attack Iran in name of WMDs (but actually oil as like Iraq). So Iran makes such comments, so as to defend Himself and give warnings to NOT to attack Iran. If usa & israel let them live in Peace, then there is NO reason that Iran will use nukes. its bullies like usa and israel that drives countries like Iran to such drastic measures, usa and israel hold nukes for 'their national interest & security', but cant let other countries have them, WHAT DOUBLE STANDARDS??!!!
How abt the time, when ussr set a nuclear base in cuba, didnt usa give an ultimatum and threatened to use nukes, if ussr didnt remove nukes base from cuba? Iran is doing the same thing, to let everyone know NOT to mess with Iran as they did with Iraq.
By the way, tell me why every citizen carry a gun in america? is it 'coz he wants to kill someone? or is it for his self-defence against any intruder? u answer this and u will get ur answer. Peace to All.

2006-08-25 21:33:16 · answer #3 · answered by Valentino 3 · 0 0

I think this question was for Muslims only, anyway, I am a Muslim and i am against anything that harm any nation, and everyone of u is talking about Muslims in a bad way while u didn't even speak to anyone of them, Muslims are peaceful.

2006-08-25 21:25:33 · answer #4 · answered by Nightingale 2 · 1 0

Ever since the state of Israel was founded with the support from US and Brittain in the soil of Palestinians, there has been no peace in the middle east. Erradicating the Israel state is the only logical solution to bring back peace to the middle east.

Since Israel has built and in posession of a weapon of mass destruction, aka nuclear bomb, it is only logical for the arabs to own one as well for their defense.

Look at what happen to Libanon now. They are hopeless against one of the strongest military power in the world. Even the United Nations cannot prevent Israel invassion.

2006-08-25 21:32:39 · answer #5 · answered by papadaddy 3 · 0 1

The ONLY country that used the ATOMIC bomb is USA. Yet, USA retain thousands of NUKE warheads. Why should the world trust you. You used the dirty nuclear bombs in Tolabora caves and Iraq bunkers. Israel has the nuclear too. Recently, Israel added 2 nuclear capable submarines. IRAN and ALL Islamic countries can acquire the NUKE; it is their right.

HYPOCRITS - If muslims want the nuclear power stations - it is their rights.

2006-08-25 21:23:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

well if you ask for an honest opinion..... every major power in the world has nukes...America has a history of nuking live people... Israels nuclear program is a threat to whole middle east... Pakistan and India are declared nuclear countries, neighbours and enemies.... SO WHATS WRONG WITH IRAN ACQUIRING THAT CAPABILITY

2006-08-27 05:01:36 · answer #7 · answered by coolkid 3 · 0 0

Are you in the illusion that ANY weapon is built for ANY other purpose than to be aggresively used? You don't build nukes for self-defence - USA, Russia, India, Israel, Egypt etc surely didn't! Still, if enough countries would have nukes, everybody would be too affraid to use them because of the danger of counter attack.

2006-08-25 21:20:24 · answer #8 · answered by Uros I 4 · 0 0

As said by desertjustme2006, "The ONLY country that used the ATOMIC bomb is USA. Yet, USA retain thousands of NUKE warheads".

Why America has the right to have nuclear weapons with its long history of nukes abuse?

And as said by Valentino, "usa and israel hold nukes for 'their national interest & security', but cant let other countries have them, WHAT DOUBLE STANDARDS??!!!"

And Ahwell says: "Muslims are against anything that's not muslim.", and don't you think americans (not christians) are against anything that's not american? as if they are the centre (not center) of this world?

judith r says: "build what? nukes? I hope the things blow up on the launch pad, because you know they are going to nuke Israel as soon as they can.". Why are you defending israel, while you don't think it's Arabs and Muslims right to defend themselves? What double standards!? Be fair and don't be bias; If Israel has the right to defend itself with nukes, why not Arabs and Muslims as well? If you judje according to your perfernces without being fair in looking at the situation, then realize that conflict between Arabs and Muslims on one hand and Israel on the other hand is none of American's and Americans' business. Working toward solving the conflict is welcome as long as it comes from unbiased people.

2006-08-26 17:56:16 · answer #9 · answered by Weaam 4 · 0 1

Its Israels fault to attack innocent muslims just because of a few kidnapped soldiers. But there is a difference between muslims and muslim terrorists!

2006-08-27 17:20:57 · answer #10 · answered by x12v5z 1 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers