You asked""God exists?""
Answer = YES HE does.
2006-08-25 14:04:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by whynotaskdon 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
ah yes and i too am tired of the name-calling and illogical arguments. i am on the other side of this though. i will tell you why. i grew up as a christian. my parents were christian and at one time i too was a christian. i wandered upon a girl. soon after i fell in love with this girl. i knew that the relationship would not work out and when it finally failed, i questioned everything even my very own existence. i questioned my faith and even the existence of a universe. i came to the final conclusion that though we can only prove ourselves present but not necessarily in the form of a body(i think therefore i am), that you cannot actually prove anythin. the only logical conclusion i came to in any of my quest is that there is no god or higher power. i know i may be wrong as you may be, we cannot both be right i think i am and you think you are. i am an atheist-agnostic. there is no proof of god and also no way to disprove it. i have read your sight before and it has brought up a re-evaluation but i still hold to a non theistic stance. i would like you to consider the question where did god come from? has he always existed? if this is true then why can he do so but the universe couldn't possibly do so? i do not have a proof but have found a basis for a favoring of a non theistic stance. until later.
2006-08-25 14:13:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by мΛІ€ҢΛр™ 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
We can't prove he does or doesn't exist. That's why it's called faith. You have to have faith that there is a God. It is up to each individual to weigh the information out there and decide. While it does say in the bible that you should spread the word to all people it does not say you should froce your one particular belief on them. This is where I have an issue with most religions, they preach and share the word of God, but only if you believe their religion. The main goal should be to share the word of God. So the answer to is there a God. I believe so, and I don't need a website to tell me so. I'm just tired of religois groupd manipulating people and information to try and push their point. When religion tries to use some parts of science but say other parts are made up is absolutly funny and troubling to me at the same time.
2006-08-25 14:13:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Adam F 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I can't disprove the existence of 'god'.
But I can disprove the existence of any god you care to define in detail. Contradictions constitute disproof - all I need is one. The various Christian gods are easy to refute.
But really, logical argument demands that the person making a claim to something (existing) is the one who must defend the claim. You claim there is a god? Evidence, please. It's all on you.
I went to that website and found... Intelligent Design being argued. And even Kansas threw that out.
2006-08-25 14:16:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by sheeple_rancher 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have my own view on this matter.
The question of whether or not God exists, can be related to the question of if spirits exist.
I think, there are two opposites, in a way of speaking, things, and spirits.
Matter has mass, weight, volume, and moves through time, but cannot think, perceive, or create.
Spirits, have no mass, no weight, no volume, and watch time go by, and can think, perceive, and create.
Therefore, by this definition, a spirit, is nothing, but can perceive things, and matter is something, yet cannot be cause.
Therefore do Spirits Exist?
Absolutely not.
But there are spirits, even if they do not have mass, energy, volume, and only watch time go by.
God is a spirit. Technically, spirits don't exist.
But I believe there is a God, and my God is better than your god.
2006-08-25 14:12:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Blah. This God talk is annoying. There is NO PROOF EITHER WAY. AT ALL. No proof that God exists, and no proof that God doesn't exist. All it is, is a matter of faith (or lack thereof). You have to believe in your heart there is a God, and therefore, to you, He is real.
(By the way, I am an atheist. You can't block atheists into a block of people who try to disprove people with scriptures. I could honestly care less if others believe in God.)
2006-08-25 14:09:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Stardust 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Any atheist that takes his atheism seriously should know by now disproving God is impossible to accomplish. You may show all kinds of evidences on how you think the Bible and Christians are dumb.
But at the end of the day you cant test something that by definition is untestable. You can observe him at the times he is observable and in fact humans have but atheists do not accept the testimony because it contradicts their presupposed philosophy Naturalism.
I find it interesting that most of the world is believers, yet I know countless conversions from atheist (10-15% of population) to Christianity. Yet when I talk to people that have supposedly been "Christians" that have lost faith, they still dont understand the Bible. If atheism were true, had merit, and a lot to offer people, we would be seeing a mass-migration of people from Christiainity to atheism. Aint ever gonna happen.
Christianity offers countless reward in the afterlife, peace, joy, and fullfillment. Atheism by definition offers NOTHING but the absence of belief.
2006-08-25 14:12:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
No gods exist. You can't prove that in an absolute sense either pro or con. However, you can show evidence that gods are man-made. There is plenty of evidence of this. The Bible, itself, was written by men.
You can try to claim they were "inspired" by some god or other, but there's really no evidence in the writing that it is anything close to divine.
I read the website you posted and found it wanting. There is a list of evidences that the Bible is accurate, which looks like similar attempts by Muslims to show the Quran to be accurate. In fact, you could do this with any sufficiently large book. I once did this with Moby Dick, opening up to random pages, to demonstrate this. What is left out of these lists are the many historically and scientifically wrong things that are said.
I also noticed some ranting about the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics which only demonstrated the author's ignorance of what the 2nd Law is, and his ignorance of physics in general.
2006-08-25 14:05:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by nondescript 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
it truly is an age old question that shall we or ought to in no way recognize even after lack of life shall we in no way recognize. in accordance to technology, and Athiests, He does not exist. in accordance to religious varieties and human beings with faith, He does exist. in accordance to Agnostics, He ought to or received't exist. yet now lower back to the initiating, if He does exist, perhaps quicker or later he will instruct himself or enable Himself general to the human beings, or in the Afterlife, because the Doctrine states, when you're good then you definitely will be allowed in Heaven even as God lives. no matter if it is also conceivable that there received't be an Afterlife yet He nonetheless does exist for us to in no way recognize in any respect. Then there is also the perception that He does by no skill exist nor does Heaven exist, it truly is the Athiest perception of what God is. For myself in my view, i don't think of i matter on Heaven, as a lot as i ought to genuinely favor to, there is in basic terms not something in my concepts which will enable me have self assurance that Heaven exists and there are Angels with white gowns and peace for all of something else of your submit existence on earth time. no matter if, I do have self assurance there's a God, not the God that's in images with the white gown, lengthy beard, halo, and each thing else, yet some type of more beneficial entity that we do not learn about and ought to in no way learn about, yet i have self assurance there must be something accessible that's more beneficial valuable than something else, some entity that truly in all different words is...God.
2016-11-27 21:50:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, one of the first proofs is:
There has been no past eternity of matter.
Therefore it had to be created because there was a time when it did not exist.
Fortunately the Creator does not consist of matter.
When we see His Son return that will be proof enough.
2006-08-25 14:03:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
One of the answers to your last question referred you to the site www.GodIsImaginary.com. I dare you to read through that site if you really want an answer. I don't think you have the guts to do it.
Read everything on that site and then come back here and tell us you still believe in God. Put action where your mouth is.
2006-08-25 14:08:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋