THEY WANT 2 COVER THEIR A S S E S,
AND NOT EXPOSE THE 1 IN CHARGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I WONDER WHO THAT IS??????!!!!!!!!!????????
2006-08-25 14:06:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by bobby-bob 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
I think that Bush is an excellent president and i`m really sorry that he can`t run for another term. These upcoming elections are a total mess. They`re all a bunch of softies. I`d really hate it if Hillary Clinton were to end up in the white house exposing her feminine ideas. Where are the real men like Nixon,Bush(father) and Lyndon B. Johnson? These are times of war and we need a marshal in town.
2006-08-25 21:36:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by trespatines 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The thing is, you can't always believe what you read. you could go on 5 different news websites and get 5 stories with the same headline, but they will all have similarities and differences. It all just depends on what side of the fence the news site and reporter are on.
War is war and regardless of the alleged cover up, ofcourse there is going to be casualties, lets be real here.
2006-08-25 21:11:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Riss 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think there is a coverup at all. The Liberal Media would want us all to think that because it makes them money. Look at how they are covering this Karr crap with the Jonbenet murder. It's already been proven through the evidence that he was no where near there, yet we will have to watch every move they make with this guy, just like OJ and others, only to find out....he wasn't there.
Nope, I don't think there is any coverup at all!
2006-08-25 21:07:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because the Democrats and the media are working together to make the President look bad. War sucks, but sometime it is necessary. I would rather fight the bad guys over there than here in America. The Democrats think we can buy or talk the bad guys out of messing with us. They and the Media are wrong.
2006-08-25 21:09:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I see the casualities reported on the news every night. As for the link, you can prolly find links that 'prove' the CIA bribed the barbarians to invade Rome.
2006-08-26 00:12:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sgt. VietnamVet 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get real! The military does count injured that later die.
The military family is very close, you can not hide extra
deaths on a military base. You can see a list of the names
- you do not think the families & friends have looked at that
list & would notice a dead loved one's name.
2006-08-25 21:33:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I dont believe there is a cover up. Just like Bush didnt blow up the levee in New Orleans to flood the black neighborhoods. Dont believe everything you read.
2006-08-25 21:11:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That article is flat out bullshit. Anyone who dies from wounds in a hospital after he has been evacuated from the scene is still listed as a combat fatality.
2006-08-25 21:10:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by RunningOnMT 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is no cover-up. You shouldn't spend so much time reading biased propaganda. Go find a reliable news source. And check more than one source.
2006-08-25 21:15:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by HEartstrinGs 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Does this information changes anything from the day before?
Do not criticize unless you have a solution.
2006-08-25 21:12:15
·
answer #11
·
answered by tmcs1959 3
·
0⤊
0⤋