English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-25 13:21:04 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment

8 answers

They say the water level would raise 2 hundred feet. So a lot of land would still be left, but most islands would be wiped out and most of the worlds largest cities, which are usually on the coast, would be underwater.

2006-08-25 13:29:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

There is no land under the north pole..
The north pole is in the middle of the arctic ocean..
If you are asking how much sea levels would rise if the
ice covering the arctic ocean melted, the answer is a few feet.
Not enough to cause many problems.

2006-08-25 20:51:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The same amount. The North pole is Ice floating on the Arctic Ocean, and the level would not change. However, global warming may melt the land ice of Greenland and Antartica, which will flood out about 80% of the human population.

2006-08-25 20:32:33 · answer #3 · answered by bbowhan 2 · 1 1

All the shores near the sea or ocean all over the Earth will eventually dissapear, destroying cities, villages located near water in order to be dry land in the North Pole

2006-08-26 08:24:44 · answer #4 · answered by spyblitz 7 · 0 0

There's no land directly under the north pole. There is under the south pole, but not the north. That's frozen ocean.

2006-08-25 20:29:12 · answer #5 · answered by auntb93again 7 · 0 0

Do you mean "under" the ice of the north pole? - if so, none - there is no land under the north polar ice cap - its all ice.

2006-08-25 20:29:10 · answer #6 · answered by glazeddonut27 3 · 0 0

probably not much. that's alot of ice to melt.

2006-08-25 20:27:38 · answer #7 · answered by falangie5555 1 · 0 0

let leave it but think about ur hight and people left.

2006-08-26 06:32:21 · answer #8 · answered by g_20 v 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers