haircut 1:http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n236/numerous_2006/a8c000bb.jpg
haircut 2:http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n236/numerous_2006/bc1301ca.jpg
2006-08-25 10:45:36 · 23 answers · asked by butterfly 2 in Beauty & Style ➔ Hair
The second one. Stay away from anything remotely like the first one. You'd probably hate it five minutes after you got it, and a cut like that would take you forever to grow out.
The second one is great if you're still a teen (and you may be, IDK), but I have to agree with the other commenters that it isn't too interesting.
It's a 'safe' haircut, though, so if that's what you're after then it's probably perfect.
2006-08-30 20:07:20 · answer #1 · answered by Wo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2
2006-08-30 17:12:13 · answer #2 · answered by meg_10n 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The first one
2006-08-25 17:50:47 · answer #3 · answered by Jade 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are both great haircuts but if I had to decide on just one it would have to be the first one.
Sure glad I'm not having to really decide which for myself because I couldn't but this is your question and I say the first one is really a bit better.
2006-08-25 17:53:14 · answer #4 · answered by fedupmoma 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, they are both very O-U-T out this season. First one: too mullet-eshk. It was in style like probably 4 years ago, in the spring. Yes it was! Second: great for high school teeny boppers but has no flattering qualities whatsoever. I would say go for more layers on that one if you want to try it.
I know I am fabulous!
2006-08-25 17:50:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
haircut 2
2006-08-25 17:53:51 · answer #6 · answered by Binky 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are ugly. First makes u look like Billy Ray Cyrus wth boobs. Second looks like a 16 year old slut.
2006-08-25 17:51:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the first one
2006-08-25 17:49:11 · answer #8 · answered by [[x_**diane♥] [[cheyea bby]] 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
2nd 1
2006-08-25 17:56:06 · answer #9 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like the second one.
2006-08-30 22:35:51 · answer #10 · answered by Momiji 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋