1. c90
2. mp5n
2006-08-25 02:20:41 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
None of the above
2006-08-25 03:35:02 · answer #1 · answered by TOPKICK 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It all depends on what your doing. If you are going to engage a target outside of 50 meters, they are both weak. For CQM, there isnt a lot of difference; except that the C90 holds more rounds, and cycles a bit faster. But the C90's innaccuracy at medium/long range is worse than the MP5.
Your best bet is a 5.56mm (.223). The round is severely underrated. The U.S. military does not puchase the best rifles, but the M249 SAW is a nice setup. With the CQM setup, a lot of the weight is gone and it cycles faster than any of its counterparts. And targets can be effectively engaged from 1 to 500 meters.
What it really boils down to is: The weapon doesnt make the person, the person makes the weapon. Getting comfortable, and experienced is the key. I can accurately engage targets at 200 meters with my MP5, but that doesnt mean that I would want to rely on it.
2006-08-25 11:14:18 · answer #2 · answered by bgray0630 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
MP5n
2006-08-25 10:21:12 · answer #3 · answered by Sam X9 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on who is using it & how & why!
2006-08-25 11:59:21 · answer #4 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mp5n it carries more bullets the bullets are bigger and it can fire faster.
2006-08-25 10:42:59 · answer #5 · answered by callan w 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mp5n its sick!!!!!!!!
2006-08-25 09:22:40 · answer #6 · answered by pazz 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋