English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

we should all be inbred,right?

2006-08-24 16:49:14 · 28 answers · asked by realquietcool 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

28 answers

yes, that would be true, on a low level that is. Adam and Eve had a pure bloodline, they were the first and therefore thier genes were not tainted with problems. When they bred, and you must understand, with thier level of health and genetic perfection, they lived for a long time--as did their children, so that they would have been able to mate, and then after so long-after having so many kids it became kind of arbitrary--(there would have been a big difference between the child of 300 and one of 100 for example). But, through the ages and generations we can see what has happened because they had to mate that way. Look at all the genetic defects there are out there, all the new ones that are occuring everyday that were not there centuries ago. Why? because, our blood has, is, and will stay very tainted from millenia of it being watered down from the pure line of Adam and Eve. The defects of that increasingly altering gene line are shown more than ever in today's world, and would not have been hardly apparent 3000 years ago.

2006-08-24 17:27:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. That is why all humans can mate with each other and have fully functional offsprings. We are all of the same species but time and environment changed us a teensy bit because environment affects any species, so people from Africa and Australia are quite different. Though, still humans with limbs, a torso and a stupid brain.

Just that maybe Adam and Eve's offsprings live faraway from each other and each of them evolved to have darker skins, curlier hair or whatever traits they have.

2006-08-24 23:56:11 · answer #2 · answered by Vile Maverick 2 · 0 0

yes but it doesn't matter anymore b/c we are millions of generations away from adam and eve. so we are all inbred, but the odds of getting a genetic defect only occur when you have kids with your first cousin or someone closer to you than that. we are all inbred b/c of adam and eve, but our genetics are all so diluted that it doesn't matter unless you're having kids with your first cousin or immediate family.

2006-08-24 23:56:58 · answer #3 · answered by mighty_power7 7 · 0 0

If God created two people named Adam and Eve, which is highly questionable, then He certainly didn't stop there. Genesis 4: 16-17 is proof.

2006-08-25 00:00:07 · answer #4 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 0 0

According to the Bible their sons went to the land of Nod to find wives. The current theory that has been run by me on "the land of Nod" was that it was referring to the land of sleep as Adam was put to sleep in order to take his rib and make Eve.

As for inbreeding it has also been theorized that that early in our existence our DNA was still pure enough that it would not be a problem.

If you wanna realy talk inbreeding what about Noah....there is no mention of how his grandchildern found mates after the flood. As you may recall he also brought his daughters and their husbands.

2006-08-24 23:58:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

All human beings have genes that are 98% related to another. God put the deformaties in inbreds when he wanted it to stop.

2006-08-24 23:55:58 · answer #6 · answered by Sammy 3 · 0 0

Yeah. All Christians are inbreds.

2006-08-24 23:54:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Maybe, but we don't know Adam and Eve's entire history; it's not in the Bible.

2006-08-24 23:55:51 · answer #8 · answered by adrianj_518 3 · 0 0

Technically yes, but a couple thousand generations helps to thin the blood line.

2006-08-24 23:57:18 · answer #9 · answered by hazydaze 5 · 0 0

We can all trace our roots back to the first couple, if that's what you mean. Actually, we are all descended from Noah and his family. In breeding, or marrying your relatives was not genetically risky back then because they didn't have the genetic diseases that we have today.

2006-08-24 23:57:38 · answer #10 · answered by David S 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers