Then they would have to listen to UN.
2006-08-24 13:17:01 · 9 answers · asked by etan4u 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
good idea,but i like mine better=let the birds fly.why send a plain when we have rockets to do it and dont have to worry about plain being shot down.NUKE UM NUKE UM NUKE UM !!!!!!!!!
2006-08-26 21:05:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The democrats say it would be unfair the the terrorist in Iran,Syria and Palastine...... according to the democrats in congress the U.S. military has too fight fair......and using B-52's according too Senator Edward Kennedy would be excessive force!
2006-08-24 21:33:13 · answer #2 · answered by General Custer 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Civilian casualties. They shouldn't die because some lazy *** didn't feel like thinking of another solution. It's not the right thing to do. Besides, they probably wouldn't listen to UN, instead some terorist leader might call it war against Islam and try to wage war on the human race.
2006-08-24 20:27:15 · answer #3 · answered by Irikandji92 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because B-52's contain Bailey's, Grand Marnier and Kahlua, and you can't get those people bombed on em cause most of them don't drink.
2006-08-24 20:20:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The military can't go overboard and start killing civilians along with militants. If they do and it starts going crazy, it might cause World War III.
2006-08-25 01:02:17 · answer #5 · answered by lolasdaddy03 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because we'd rather give them a hug. And you can't hug Syria with nuclear arms, dude.
2006-08-24 20:25:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because we want a more effective war plan, and we are waiting for someone more capable of carrying it out, i.e. not Bush.
2006-08-24 21:46:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It didn't work in Vietnam. The USA was defeated.
2006-08-25 01:35:35 · answer #8 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wow another genocidal rethug.
2006-08-24 20:22:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋