people who are BOTH anti-abortion and pro-death penalty are hypocrites?

Question

statement: MOST of these people are hipocrits.
reason: the number one exsplanation paraphased is "fetus = innocent, bad to kill innocent. death row = murderer, good to kill murderer"
when faced with the facts that it is posible for a wrongfully convited man to be exicuted, they do one of the following:
- ignore the fact
- state any one who is wrongfully convicted must be involved somehow and has some level of guilt
- admits to flaws in the system and the posiblity of a man being wrongfully put to death but says it does more good than harm

to the first option i say they need a brain
to the secondand third i give this
you are person A
person B kills person C.
person B then plant incriminating eveidens with person A's dna
person A is convited and sentanced to death

sorry fogot to put question on the end(hit wrong button)
can you prove that you are not ? if so support your answer

feel free to IM me

patrick no you are wrong hypocrites plurel form of hypocrit
hipocrit - one who is hypocritical

yahoo adds question mark to any title that does not have one

parepidemos_00 falls into the first group
this person fails to admit it is even posible to have a wrongfully convicted man on death row

to all the IGNORANT PEOPLE
think before you post i am saying all those who say abortion is wrong BECAUSE it is an innocent life should be against the death penalty because while killing mureders you will kill the occational wrongfully convicted and innocent man

i dont know how so many of you can not understand reasoning but yet are able to type !!!!!

Answer 1

word. It is hypocritical.

Answer 2

I am not a Christian, but I don't see the hipocrisy there. I see it in the rest of the Christian value system vs. death penalty. How about where a terminally-ill patient should not engage in assisted suicide, because it is "playing God," but it is o.k. to terminate the life of a convicted murderer? What if God's plan involved that convicted murderer's "salvation," but you killed him first? Oops.

Give me a break. Isn't it all about *quality* of life? The Christians selectively and conveniently apply their value system. A terminally-ill person has no quality left, and should have the right to choose a peaceful exit. A convicted murderer takes from society and contributes nothing. An unwanted child has what kind of quality of life? Most abortions are obtained by young and/or immature partiers, who probably exposed their fetuses to all kids of potential problems already. Do you want your kids raised with all these physically and/or emotionally disadvantaged children?

"Judge not, lest you be judged"; "Vengeance is mine, saith the Lord." Huh?

Answer 3

Not necessarily. Anti-abortion folks consider that the fetus is logically a human being from the moment of conception (true) and that this gives it unlimited rights against all others, including the mother (obviously silly).

Some death penalty avocates consider that it is justifiable if the nature of the crime is such that the perpetrator has surrendered his humanity in committing it, and that putting him to death is no more morally repugnant than killing a dangerous animal. This includes me. Is there any reason that McVeigh should have been permitted to live after killing 167 people?

Answer 4

*makes a buzzer sound* wrong answer. People who are getting the death penalty had a choice to make their mistake. They deserve it. Children who are murdered never had a choice. They never get the right to choose how they will live. The person who gets the death penalty made his choice. You're right...sometimes the death penalty is wrong and people are wrongfully killed. But for how long it takes to even be sentenced, it's highly unlikely. In abortion, the child is always killed. Always. With no choice.

Answer 5

I answered this question yesterday. Why don't you read or have someone read it to you. Your ABC analogy is not real common. It may happen in extremely rare cases that evidence is planted and occasions with DNA evidence are even more rare. If you were to attempt to state your true opinion, which you seem too much of a coward to do, you would say that you don't even want those who are truly guilty to be executed. Come on brave boy, Tell us you real position. Don't hide behind the rare cases of people who were falsely convicted. Why are you too chicken to admit it? Either you know your position is wrong and you are embarrassed by it or you are being dishonest and trying to divert attention away from those killers who gleefully admit that they murdered their victim and can't wait to kill more people. Which is it, dishonesty or embarrassment?

Answer 6

Abortion is not killing a child, it is getting rid of a clump of cells. A clump of cells that is not innocent or guilty of anything because it is not a human at that point. Guilty prisoners who have killed someone else deserve to die.

Answer 7

Only if they can't differentiate between pre-born children and felons? Why are you ending a statement with a question mark?

Answer 8

And where is the hypocrisy in understanding the difference between innocent babies and guilty rapists and murders?

Answer 9

not me kill them all and let the gods sort them out is that islamic point of view

Answer 10

I totally agree with you. I'm pro women's choice, anti war, and anti-capital punishment.

Answer 11

I agree