The city of Dallas is looking at possibly banning sagging/ baggy pants in the city limits citing a public lewdness law and hoping to cut down gang violence as it is common practice for some gang members to conceal weapons in loose pants/shorts. Can they enforce this law?
2006-08-24 11:32:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
the constitution gives all the police power to the states. yes it is constitutional but not right. however it may be protecting society if they pass it, because if i see one more black *** hanging in my face im going to shoot him. we are tired of thug life mentality. thugs look so ignorant when their *** hangs out. i say to them. keep showing your butt we eventually are going to spank it. city and state police. fbi. prison. jail. probation.the morgue. parole. handcuffs. and last but not least orange suits that cover your black ***.
2006-08-24 13:57:02 · answer #1 · answered by locofreads 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think this trend is so funny. Gang-bangers shooting with one hand and holding their trousers up with the other. What happens when they need to re-load? They can't run in those things.
Yes, Dallas can enforce a low barring the public show of undergarments. It is not the pants, but what shows under them, the underwear.
2006-08-24 18:48:56 · answer #2 · answered by Don 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. Banning baggy pants is agianst the first ammendment and is not constitutional in anyway.
Peace. Love. Unity. Tim D
2006-08-24 18:33:47 · answer #3 · answered by Tim D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares. I'm so tired of seeing people walk around like that. This trend has been around for several years already, it just needs to die. The whole world should ban them!
2006-08-24 18:38:02 · answer #4 · answered by nimo22 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think they'd manage to do it but it's a good idea. Baggy pants are SO unattractive, the FASHION police should ban them!
2006-08-24 18:34:44 · answer #5 · answered by Susie 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm fine with it, as long as they ban the low-rise jeans women wear, that shows the tops of their asses, and their thong.
2006-08-24 18:36:19 · answer #6 · answered by Muskratbyte 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about constitutionality, but they certainly are a fashion violation in the highest order!
2006-08-24 18:38:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows. It's probably a publicity stunt more than anything else.
2006-08-24 18:35:19 · answer #8 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not! But that has never stopped a politician.
2006-08-24 18:37:39 · answer #9 · answered by rab_fw 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋