Mikhail Gorbachev endorses Hillary, why? Does Mikhail see Hillary's methods as being close to his own?
2006-08-24 11:03:39 · 13 answers · asked by dam 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Hey Hathor, don't call me an idot because I only ask this to hear you point of view and I'm sure you can do better than name calling.
2006-08-24 11:20:08 · update #1
notyou, It doesn't sound like you lived in the ussr at that time, where did you hear that from CNN, Gorby tried to tighten his grip on the country to the point that the people revolted because they saw a return to stall's days.
2006-08-24 11:23:35 · update #2
CBH, That's very close to my point. It seems the media Fox, CNN, and the rest of them are chosing the Narrow scope of who we are allowed to even vote for. Now come on people Gorby comes out for Hillary and we are told this is a good thing?
2006-08-24 11:31:06 · update #3
Democrats or Republican it really doesn't matter. They really both stand for the same things. Remember the old adage, absolute power corrupts absolutely? Then why in a nation of the people do we keep the same two corrupt parties in nearly all of our offices?
Gorbachev was actually considered a reformer compared to his predecessors. It was his reforms that eventually led to Russian democracy and the collapse of the "Red Scare". Boris Yeltsin just pushed him aside instead of having the communist party, (which was doomed to failure in Russia after Gorby's social reforms, and relinquishing the grips the Reds had on the Russian people...) die in office.
Legitimate third parties need financial backing in our country in order to make our government more accessible to the people. I agree that Hilary is a bad choice for Pres. So isn't Cheney, or any other politician willing to vote along the same old party lines just to stay in office. Voters need to make that change as well. Too many people vote along the same party lines politicians do without giving issues serious thought. sorry that was real long.
2006-08-24 11:21:45 · answer #1 · answered by CHB 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yjest the last best hope for women of this country and maybe
this country women has made good later for other country
even in Asia .so when will we see them as intelligence thay bring
us in to world and teach us for 18 or 20 year or thay teach us
in school for 18 year or more so why not have the teacher lead
us out of problem and make it better country and Maybe a better world
2006-08-24 20:23:45 · answer #2 · answered by the B, kid @sbcglobal.net 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, I think we're closer to becoming a monarchy with hereditary claim to the throne. When Jeb wins the next "election", I'll be proven right
2006-08-24 18:10:17 · answer #3 · answered by . 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Your ignorance is shocking. Gorbachav was the first democratic leader in Russia. Because of him, there is no more communist party. He was and is a close friend to many US presidents and the American people.
2006-08-24 18:06:55 · answer #4 · answered by notyou311 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If Hillary becomes president, I'll go back to Greenland.
2006-08-24 18:23:56 · answer #5 · answered by Martin523 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
the best chance to become a laughing stock by the entire world.
2006-08-25 00:46:06 · answer #6 · answered by Work In Progress 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She is definitely not the last. She may be the best at the moment.
2006-08-24 20:48:05 · answer #7 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush is the closest thing to a dictator this country has had or ever will have again.
2006-08-24 18:10:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Probably bc they both have birthmarks on their heads!
2006-08-24 18:06:31 · answer #9 · answered by kimmypoo 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Open your eyes you idiot! Its happening now!!
Wake up and spit out the Koolaid before its too late.
2006-08-24 18:11:50 · answer #10 · answered by Hathor 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋