LCD or DLP???

Question

I'm looking in to buying my first HDTV. My budget is 2000-2300. Which technology do you prefer - LCD or DLP - and why? Any suggestions on specific models???

Answer 1

LSD

Answer 2

LCD is really hot right now, because the resolution is quickly improving and people want the flat panel for spending the big dollars.

I have a Sharp Aquos 2006 model and a Samsung DLP 2005 model.

I really like my DLP better. It looks better for HD 1080i broadcasts, Xbox 360 and Sports. The DLP has a feature that upon doing my research that nobody else mentioned, was that the projection system makes certain images have a 3-D look - Proportion and Depth Perception. This makes movies and NFL Football look much, much better. DLP is really awesome, but has 2 flaws: Extreme Daylight dampens the picture moreso than Plasma/LCD; It isn't a flat panel cabinet running the TV. DLP's are slim but not entirely low profile.

For 2300, I'd get a 1080p Samsung DLP tv - or I'd get a 2006 Sony SXRD 50" 1080p tv. Those are the best.

Answer 3

LCD!
You can get a nice LCD, or Plasma for that price. The plasma will be bigger, but a little lower resolution.

I can't stand the angle limitations on the DLPs. They're only good if you're more or less, right in front of them. the height is important as well. Plus DLPs are much thicker- although if you've got the room, perhaps that;s not a deciding factor.

If you go Plasma- the Panasonic's consistently get excellent reviews. For LCD- there are a few. I just selected a Sharp, but there are a number of good brands. Just make sure that you're getting the latest model (by checking on line). Often at places like BestBuy I've seen them selling 'last years' model. They're making technology leaps every year on these products, so get the latest!

Answer 4

For that price range, you're best off with a DLP, for many of the reasons stated above--sharper, no risk of dead pixels, no risk of burn-in. The downside is that it's not flat (but not hulking big like the old projection TV's either), and every few years you might have to replace the bulb; but once you do it's almost as good as new, as opposed to Plasmas which will irreversibly fade over time.

Yes, LCD's are getting nearly as good as DLP with regards to contrast ratio (deeper blacks and whiter whites and more gradations in between) and response time (the time it takes for a signal to get displayed--LCD's are notorious for not being able to process quickly enough, resulting in blocky digitized artifacts if something's moving fast), but at considerably greater cost. So if money is no object, sure, get yourself the fanciest LCD or Plasma. But for $2K-$2.5K, a DLP is the best choice if you're going with anything bigger than 32". Samsung's 87w and 88w lines offer 1080p HDTVs at a reasonable price.

My tip? Along with all the info you glean from here, go to your local electronics store and scrutinize all the different types for yourself.

Answer 5

lcd! lcd! lcd! listed right here are few the rationalization why lcd rankings over projection TVs. a million. even with the undeniable fact that projection TVs are available higher sizes, the decision isn't any more desirable higher than LCDs (it quite is max decision of a rear projection is same as lcd 1920 x1080) 2. Rear projection - extreme priced upkeep. Rear projection TVs have mild engines to direct mild. those are extreme priced and characteristic restricted existence time. Mechanical mis-alignments of Prisms & mild Engines can take position if care isn't taken. 3. skill intake of rear projection TVs are a lot more desirable 4. lcd TVs are lighter, a lot less skill hungry, backlight has 25-30 situations longer existence than the mild engines of rear projection TVs, a lot less cumbersome and could be held on wall

Answer 6

LCD, definately. New LCD HDTVs are the top of the line. Don't let anyone ever tell you otherwise. They have absolutely no disadvantages. They aren't susceptible to burn-in, like plasmas, aren't clunky like CRTs, and won't easily burn out, like DLPs

Problems that LCDs have had in the past, like poor black levels, low brightness, blur, and high price have been recently remedied. New LCDs now have amazing black levels, even better than CRTs, the previous best. Also, blur and brightness is no longer an issue. Plus, the price of LCDs keeps dropping as more people accept the technology. LCDs have proven themselves to be the future standard for high definition television, and because of this, many companies are beginning to stop production on other types of TVs, such as Sony, the industry leader.

Your best bet is to buy an LCD released within the passed two years or so. That way you won't risk buying a TV that will be outmoded in a few years.

This is probably the single best TV you'll find in your price range:

http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start?ProductSKU=KDLV32XBR1&Dept=tvvideo&CategoryName=tv_flatpanel_26%22to42%22

Happy hunting!

Answer 7

If you are talking projection, the DLPs are a better bet. You can get one for under $2k US. LCDs have a little better color, but the DLPs are sharper. Most of the people I know that have purchased LCDs have pixels that are out.

If you are talking flat screen (you can't get a DLP flat screen) then LCDs are superb.

I have (and know several people) with Samsung 42" and 50" DLPs and I (and them) are all quite happy with them.

Answer 8

I think the DLP is easier to fix. When the light burns out it can be replaced by the owner and when you get dead pixels the CCD (I think that's what they use) is easier to replace by a technician. Having said all that, the LCD is a lighter TV if weight is a consideration.

Answer 9

DLP, Longer Lasting and Bigger Screen Sizes.