English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

?

2006-08-24 05:36:38 · 10 answers · asked by Why Does It Do That? 1 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

10 answers

15 years to life , but it should be far worse than that. The abuser should be exposed to the abuse they imposed on the child. If you can harm a child you need to be behind bars for life with some why of you haven to look at what you did to the child day in and day out.

2006-08-24 06:17:39 · answer #1 · answered by Peachs 2 · 0 0

Life, but it should be far worse than that. The abuser should be exposed to the abuse they imposed on the child.

2006-08-24 05:43:09 · answer #2 · answered by proud mom of 2 girls 2 · 0 0

Depends on your depth of abuse. Personally if you've destoyed a young life..........death would be an acceptable solution.

2006-08-24 05:42:58 · answer #3 · answered by Cherie 6 · 0 0

I believe that it should be a suspended sentence. The guilty should be suspended from some suitable gibbet or gallows like structure until they stop twitching.

2006-08-24 17:15:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

in my state it is life but the av. is 0-15 years

2006-08-24 05:44:30 · answer #5 · answered by steamroller98439 6 · 0 0

Life sentence.

2006-08-24 05:39:08 · answer #6 · answered by Markster 2 · 0 0

depends on the abuse. I think it should be LIFE!

2006-08-24 05:39:28 · answer #7 · answered by Amy A 3 · 0 0

If it's your third strike in a three-strike state you can get LIFE IN PRISON!

2006-08-24 05:39:01 · answer #8 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0 0

40yrs depending on state.

2006-08-24 20:20:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

not enough

2006-08-24 11:15:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers