English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1) Are the white republicans creating fear of terrorism to get elected and stay in power?

2) Are the American people going to destroy the country and themselves by creating mistrust and hatred among each racal group?

3) What are the republicans going to do after the American peole no longer care about their war on terrorism?

2006-08-24 02:39:56 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Civic Participation

18 answers

1. No, BTW. Is there a difference between a white republican and any other race. If so, would you care to elaborate because you are sounding like you are trying to create mistrust between racial groups.

2. No, However, it is to some people's advantage to divide the country among racial lines in order to gain political strength. I believe you may fall into that category - see question 1.

3. Both republicans and Democrats and any other sub group should be concerned about terrorism. Hopefully, when the day comes when this is no longer an issue, we can disagree about something less threatening.

Have a nice day

2006-08-24 02:53:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

1) Your premise that republicans are all white is a racist statement.
If the democrats get into office, they will play the same terrorism card, and probably start to really strip us of our rights.

2) The American people have always had a mistrust among racial groups. There will always be a mistrust and hatred, as long as there are different races.

3) The war on terrorism has been going on for many years, long before 9/11 happened. The government had to bring it into the public realm because of 9/11. Remember the Eighties?

The question is how will Americans react when the public no longer cares about the war on terrorism.

A previous poster stated that every free society degenerates into tyranny. What is the basis for that statement? There has never been a society as free as ours, at anytime in history. What is the basis for that statement? Give us facts.
The fact is, is that there can never be a totally FREE society. There must be someone in a position of leadership, to speak for the society as a whole. It is called a democracy. There must be limits placed on a society, or else chaos will reign.

2006-08-24 19:01:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1) No. They do not have to "create" a fear of terrorism.. the terrorists are doing a nice job of that on their own.

2) No. Americans have always been divided racially and ethnically. What will destroy the country is allowing a particular illegal group to take over.

3) The republicans are the only group that offer solutions to the MANY problems facing this country: education, social security, taxes, terrorism, to name a few. The democrats have not had a single IDEA in several decades.

Your questions are inane and repetitive. Come up with something new or at least provide your OWN solutions to the problems.

2006-08-24 10:29:12 · answer #3 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 0 0

1. Yes. But I think an important distinction has to be made. The Republicans are not creating fear of terrorism, they are exploiting it to stay in power. The fear of terrorism is real, and would exist without the Republicans using it to score political points. Also, I don't see why you say "white" Republicans instead of just "Republicans."

2. No. By many measures, racial harmony is actually growing in this country. Interracial marriages are becoming more and more common and serious hate crimes less so.

3. I'm not sure what you are asking here. If you are asking what the Republicans will come up with after the WoT no longer interests people, I think they will come back to their traditional issues: the economy, crime, public morality, and general foreign affairs.

2006-08-24 09:48:47 · answer #4 · answered by timm1776 5 · 0 3

1) To stay in power is part of the answer, but the truth is that many of those people are businessmen and terrorism inflames national pride and causes the war....so they make more money.
2)They have already polarize people against many races. But the destruction that is happening today is the slow invasion by foreign capital. Nearly 100% of the commercial building in Honolulu belong to Japan, about 85% of Los Angeles, and about 1/3 of New York City (Both the British and Dutch own more). Japan controls Universal Studios, Sony (obviously) and other media. We spend a billion dollars a day in Japan but we are blocked by the Japanese so American products have no chance there.
3) As in the Vietnam War, people will get tired of it and the next president will have the task of withdrawing troops and trying to heal an angry people.

2006-08-24 09:53:41 · answer #5 · answered by Frank 6 · 0 2

I have an answer for all three.
1) I would have to say yes their doing more of that then taking action.
2)YES because some people are so negative towards other races and that's just not right. Look around the world people are only caring about number one (themselves) don't get me wrong their are some people who care about others theirs just not enough people around the world like that. It shouldn't take a disaster to bring people together we should be doing that one the regular basics.The American people need to wake up and realize that we're going to be in a pickle even more then we already are if we don't shape up.
3)Their not doing much of anything but talking a bunch of smack.If they really wanted to do something they would protect our ports.

2006-08-24 10:37:37 · answer #6 · answered by kayla 1 · 0 0

1) Stupid question. Republicans did not drive the planes into the WTC.

2) Another stupid, uninformed question. Racism has been going on for centuries. (it's 'racial', not 'racal', dummie). Racism is far less of a problem when compared to 50 years ago when I was growing up.

3) Pull their hair out in frustration. Don't you get it? There are people out there who want to KILL YOU! They are very patient and persistent. Not to mention very secretive. Another stupid question.... Only stupid people would not care about a war on terrorism. Fortunately, at least two major political leaders care... Tony Blair and George Bush. Go team!

2006-08-24 09:56:24 · answer #7 · answered by Mr. Peachy® 7 · 1 0

Wow! 3 great questions!

1. Yes. Terror is a very old and effective means to conquer a free society. Every "free" society eventually degenerates into tyranny through government instilled fear.

2.Yes. Racial diversity is forced upon us by political correctness, but is in fact the most divisive element in any society and has absolutely no cohesive value. Government knows this well and proceeds to "divide and conquer" the people!

3. That's a big 'if'. This government has learned well the lessons of History and knows how to keep a population terrorized and submissive. In my opinion, were the people of this once-great Nation to rise up en masse against this unlawful government, the government would use force against us to remain in power and thus a revolution would be born.

2006-08-24 09:50:34 · answer #8 · answered by Paladin 4 · 0 3

1. No, the Islamic militants did that with the bombing of the twin towers, the Cole Bombing, The Embassy bombings, 911, etc..etc.. Didn't need help from white Americans

2. Even though we have racial problems here as does every country in the world, we will all stick together to kick your butt

3. We will no longer care about the war on terrorism when the terrorist's are dead. All of them or their sponsors

2006-08-24 09:47:29 · answer #9 · answered by mark g 6 · 4 1

1. i think it may be a problem to generalise about this. i do think the current government may be trying to create this ongoing buzz.
2. i hope the American people can get above this and not allow themselves to be manipulated. but it is affecting the whole world. look at England
3. Hopefully, there will come a time when people realise that there is no war on terror unless you are marginalising/disenfranchising people.

2006-08-24 09:54:02 · answer #10 · answered by Zvisineyi 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers