If Iran can't have nuclear weapons, why is it OK for Isreal and others?

Question

and why does Bush always refer to them a "nookaleer" weapons?

Answer 1

1. US has an Isreal first foriegn policy. They are premitted to do things no other country would be allowed to get away with.
2. Iran is not trying to produce nukes. The lie that they are is a neo-con myth created to prepare us for war against another muslim country that has not attacked us.
3. The nuke powers try to limit the number of countries that have nuclear weapons because the more countries that have them decreases the value of our nuclear terrors. (Exceptions are #1 above)

Answer 2

Bush sees himself as the great White Crusader, out to save all mankind from itself. Only HE knows what is right, and the Iranians do not know what is right. Bush thinks every other country on the face of the earth should be just like the US, and this is the core problem, that along with the fact that he says God talks to him and tells him what to do, such as invade Iraq.

Now in the case of Israel, jews in the US have made it so that they are the only ones in the world who matter, and have brainwashed politicians into believing that. Bush believes that too, so he will spend as many US taxpayer dollars as necessary to protect Israel while doing nothing to protect our own southern border from illegal Mexican invasions. So, now that Israel and the jews are the only ones that matter, Iran obviously do NOT matter, and since their president has made the horrifying remark that Israel should be wiped off the face of the planet, it is clear to Bush, after talking some more to God, that Israel must have nookaleer weapons to "defend" itself and that everything must be done to stop Iran from getting these same nookaleer weapons. It is OK for North Korea to have nookaleer weapons because there are no jews anywhere near North Korea so the North Koreans are not a threat like the Irainians are a threat.

So, the great White Crusader must stop Iran at all costs.

Answer 3

Nuclear weapons are not ok for any country, and nuclear fuel should be banned too. As a country that possess both, we hardly have the right to comment on the rights of other countries to have the technology. Everyone should be made to watch War Games.... a kids film with Mathew Brodderick, it proves conclusively no-one can win a nuclear war.

Answer 4

Israel wasn't allowed - they built the secretly and did not sign the non-poliferation treaty as a non-nuclear member. Iran signed the non-poliferation treaty as a member not to develop nuclear weapons. There are many nations that signed that treaty that certainly have the ability to develop such weapons for many years(ex: Italy, Germany, Japan, Canada, Australia, South Africa) yet all of them abide by the treaty. Iran has also made statement arguing that they would use such weapons and/or give them to other individuals.

Answer 5

OK for Israel ONLY!
Israel is the only country in the middle east who is allowed unconditionally to have and develop all kinds of mass destruction
weapons including nuclear weapons.
Israel has ALREADY threatened its neighbors in 1973 in Yom Kippor war.
Israel was going to attack Egypt and Syria to
bomb their capitals ( Cairo and Damascus) with nuclear bombs
although Egypt and Syria NEVER EVER had that sort of weapons.
Israel has recently very few years ago threatened Syria that it could attack it with nuclear weapons in case of any Syrian attack
Why is it OK for Israel to have nuclear weapons?! because
Israel is ALWAYS above the law
not only in WMD issue, in human rights, in war crimes,in security
council resolutions
Israel gets an exceptional treatment in every thing!!!!

Answer 6

The question shows just how inept you are.

And responses like freedomhammer's is exactly what you retards love to believe, conspiracies and propaganda. No objective thought at all on this one.

The Israelis weren't "allowed" to have them. They stole the technology and developed them in secret. We don't want anyone to have them because of the dangers associated. It isn't strictly anti-Iran. If Chad tried to develop nuclear weapons we would do the same thing. We stopped South Afica in 1990s.

Answer 7

its not ok. everyone wants to get rid of nuclear weapons and that cause will not be helped by Iran joining the club. the more people who have nookaleer weapons, the bigger and more difficult the disbanding of them will be.

anyways, when it comes to disbanding, its widely acknowledged that Israel will be the last. they simply will not agree to be anything before the last.

Answer 8

Israel, if it has such weapons, has not threatened its neighbors or any other country with annihilation, nor questioned its neighbors' right to exist.

Iran does not play by international rules, much less abide by treaties (specifically the IAEA treaty that it ratified) nor international law.

You may not mind a bunch of theocratic, martyrdom-crazed lunatics in your backyard having nukes, especially ones with so little respect for the survival of Western culture and Western life. But most of us do.

Answer 9

Only hillbilly can answer this one:
"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it." -- Ariel Sharon to Shimon Peres, October 3rd, 2001, as reported on Kol Yisrael

Answer 10

or better yet ...Why is it ok to even produce them? Oh...wait...money! Makes the world go round shuga!

Bush is an idiot...please don't judge america on that moron. Only half of us (if that...since so many don't bother to vote) voted that assjack in.