2006-08-23 11:17:59 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Mental Health
Oh..... so he hates our guts before flying plains around our country like missle's they went to see Saddam often
2006-08-23 11:24:27 · update #1
Personally no. I think that Bush made the right decision to invade Iraq, he treated his people like ****!!!!!! And that is coming from someone who spent a year over in that country. If the people of the US could see the way that the people of Iraq lived they would shut their damn mouth and support the President, and the troops that are over there now.
2006-08-23 11:28:27 · answer #1 · answered by ryan m 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Huh? What?! Does it matter who funded Osama? I
t was right to go after Sadaam for the atrocities he committed in Iraq and to prevent the influx of refugees from his country. Forget about the oil, funding, and WMDs; that was the only legit reason to go after Sadaam.
2006-08-23 18:26:20 · answer #2 · answered by Grown Man 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The idea was right, the execution was poor. Something had to be done about him...but trying to rebuild Iraq like that wasn't exactly good. Probably would have been better to split it into 3 countries, one for each of the Islam sects.
2006-08-23 18:23:49 · answer #3 · answered by Phoenix 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
First, he did not fund Osama. Second, we could have "gone after" Sadam and even gotten him, but we didn't need to destroy Iraq in the process. We didn't have to kill hundreds of thousands of women and children in the process. George Dubya could have avenged his father with much less destruction to the American public, Iraq and the world.
He has caused terrorism to grow and millions of people to hate us and to be willing to die, if they can harm us in the process.
2006-08-23 18:24:46 · answer #4 · answered by lcmcpa 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He has no ties to Osama Bin Laden at all. He is being charged for ordering entire villages to be gassed and burned and tortured. But I guess you wouldn't care about anything he did unless it somehow was twisted to affect your life. Thats why we don't care about Africa because they have no resources for us to steal/use.
If we cared about who funded such terrorists, we'd go after Iran or even Pakistan but we went for Iraq. What does that tell you??
2006-08-23 18:24:58 · answer #5 · answered by Naomi P 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He didn't fund Osama....Bush and Cheney did....They created to the attacks to fuel their Neo-Con agenda. And it worked....they have the Patriot Act, wire-tapping of citizens, and Halliburton rules the world.
2006-08-23 18:59:13 · answer #6 · answered by Panda Man Dan 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think we should have quit listening to the UN when Bush sr was in office and finished the job then.
2006-08-23 18:27:30 · answer #7 · answered by coolmom 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Huh? Being brainwashed by Bush and Co., eh?
2006-08-23 18:25:59 · answer #8 · answered by worldneverchanges 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wrong information - he didn't fund Osama. Not sure what your source is but you better check on that.
2006-08-23 18:20:21 · answer #9 · answered by spaceskating_girl 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sadaam did not fund Osama.
2006-08-23 18:24:04 · answer #10 · answered by Daphne 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋