Do you want me to tell you how the universe and life came into being?

Question

I don't know.

Neither do you.

All anyone has is speculation and scientific theory and lengthy mathematical equations.

I don't have anything against any creationists, but if you state that you know how it happened you're wrong no matter what you think. Unless you saw it happen you don't know, don't try to convince me of a religion because it provides answers for something I don't know, because you don't know either. Neither of us knowing isn't proof for either of us. Logic isn't necesarily proof either.

Keep an open mind and don't let religion blind you or convince you that you know something because it said so. I don't claim to know anything for sure besides what can be proven, retested, and proven again.

Is it so unreasonable to ask that people don't act like they know something when they obviously can't?

Answer 1

Not at all. If you don't know how something happened, don't act like it. Feel free to specualate and guess but don't act like you know as if you saw it happen yourself. Logic means nothing if knowledge is lacking, and faith doesn't prove a thing.

Answer 2

All science can offer you is the most reasonable explanation based on evidence and facts that can be tested, peer reviewed and experiments that can be duplicated. Sorry if that is not enough for you.
At least it better that basing you ideas on faith based on a book of fables a couple of thousand years old that have been edited by the Church to control the masses.

Answer 3

it's good to keep an open mind. my beliefs are based on many different opposing viewpoints that i've read about and i kind've just picked the ones that sounded most believable. also, i've had experience that contradict common sense, so a few of my beliefs may not make sense to someone else.

Answer 4

properly there would desire to be an infinite cycle of universeses exploding out of the unique universe, then starting to be, shrinking through break down and warmth dying, in basic terms to explode lower back until time breaks down on the seams and we loop lower back to the commencing up. Or we'd be a "bubble" some universe created with the help of a catastrphophic experience in a parrallel measurement, an large volume of capacity launch that coalesced into rely and became the universe as all of us comprehend it. **** we would desire to be no longer something extra desirable than a working laptop or computing gadget simulation with the help of a few nether realm scientist to work out what would take place able without god to steer them. we would desire to in basic terms be a quantum hickup, for all eterntity looping lower back onto itself rely and antimatter anhilated themselves persistently lower back until a great volume ignored eachother in one burp of threat and right here we are. **** the completed international would desire to be sitting on top of a ruby bull status on a leviathan. Or we would desire to be the tears of a few forsaken titan. there are a number of techniques that the universe would have been created, theological and in any different case. We in basic terms would desire to attend another20 billion or so years to ascertain who became into suited. Now that my rambling is out of how i visit condense your 2 introduction innovations into categories, faith and technology. and then i will toss it out that a religions introduction tale takes extra faith to belive to be authentic when you consider that's reported that "that is how that's and there is no longer something you're able to do approximately it." on an analogous time as technology is making an attempt to create a narrative of our universe by remark and impirical archives amassing, additionally, technology is fluid or perhaps the main steadfast of rules are up for revision if some opposite data comes up, yet maximum religions are approximately as versatile as a three foot thick wall of steel.

Answer 5

Fundies "feel" truth., they don't understand and take an objective opinion based on evidence, they take an already established unwavering belief and reject or embrace incoming information which fits into the mold of their faith.

Answer 6

It was a valiant effort Dan, but you cannot convince people of faith to change their beliefs via reason, as faith, by definition, is the opposite of reason.

it's OK tho'. They are comfortable and happy with their faith. It takes the burden from their brain, and puts in in the trust of their religious leaders.

Answer 7

I've read the Bible, and it holds Absolute Truth.

Answer 8

If you don't know, and anything we say is ABSOLUTELY wrong, then what the heck is your argument?

.....uhhhhhhhhh, doi!

and, btw, there's this thing called grammar. just thought you might like to know.

Answer 9

I already know and it's called faith. I'm allowed to have faith and you're allowed not to. Isn't it great?!?!

Answer 10

No, I'm not going to tell you.

: P