Why is Amnesty International accusing Israel of war crimes?

Question

I guess they are either

a) A terrorist organization,
b) Islamic extremists,
c) Anti-semitic, or
d) unbiased and objective.

Answer 1

Because Israel is committing war crimes.
So.....they are.....D.

Answer 2

Because Amnesty International will always be there for Murderers and terrorists. They are Anti-Semitic and they hate the fact that Israel has the ability to defend itself from the low life terrorists that are welcomed into Lebanon with open arms

Answer 3

Well, let's look at the facts:
Israel has deep respect for other races and other countries
Israel is a pacifist nation and abhors the killing of innocents
Israel has a profound sense of understanding and compassion for the Palestinians, in particular.
Israel has never commited any atrocities against innocent civilians.
Israel always chooses peaceful methods to resolve disputes
Israel would never cause any harm or destruction to any country unless it was attacked militarily first
Israel thinks that assassinations are totally unacceptable
That's why I can't understand why Amnesty International can issue such an unfair label on Israel

Answer 4

actually, what they are doing is taking one side of the issue and saying that if so-and-so is the case, then Israel is guilty of war crimes. However, according to the Geneva Convention, if what Israel did was actually due to Hezbollah's use of civilain areas to hide munitions, fire rockets or even house officers, Hexbollah is guilty of war crimes. Also, if Israel can show that targets were "dual use" then they are not guilty. This is the equivalent of someone accusing you of a crime and then making your guilt conditional on both defining the crime and clarifying the events. There is no value to it except as a good headline until the details are sorted out. My only question is why they aren't also making similar accusations against the Arabs who, pending discovery of the exact same set of facts, would be guilty of the war crime.

hezbollah admitted targeting civilian areas and puts up no excuse about "dual use" or anything like that. So Hezbollah is then doubly guilty -- using their own civilians as shields and attacking Israel's civilian population centers. As to why Amnesty isn't making headlines about that, one could say choice F -- the world is looking for an excuse to belittle Israel and condone Muslim terrorism.

Answer 5

it somewhat is an exciting question and countless people right here communicate approximately "warfare crimes" and don't define what's a warfare crime. Israel says it did no longer "objective" civilians yet i ask your self whilst does reckless dismiss for civilian secure practices improve into some thing greater culpable than collateral injury in a protecting protection rigidity action? I additionally ask your self appropriate to the great form of civilians who have been killed, incredibly given the certainty that Israel is meant to have such precision, surgical gadgets of warfare. the theory seems to be that any quantity of rigidity is suitable in the "self-protection" of Israel and that it is not substantial who strikes first, or who violates a stop hearth. all of us comprehend who the good adult males are, they're our best buddy Israel, and Israel can not commit warfare crimes, it may only look after itself. in the U. S. we do no longer somewhat have adequate information approximately how Hezbollah aimed its rockets. I comprehend that some have been fired at protection rigidity targets, yet their reason would possibly no longer have been lots different from Israel. it is, hearth at protection rigidity targets, yet whilst the rocket is going off beam, so what? yet in particular in the U. S. this is heresy to even think of that something that Israel did became into extreme, reckless, or something on the threshold of a warfare crime or that Hezbollah might have fired at protection rigidity targets.

Answer 6

what some times so stuped prime ministers order to kikll childeren and what is out of princple of war they know that the muslim world is big from pakistan to iran and afganistan they now that they stand on america and some stuped alies of christain .

if muslims marsh one day they now that they are only three million and could lose war against provet mohame dreliogion
undre me and on my eye s I do not like what they are doing in lebnon and plastain as an arabic who revenges too musch

israeal must cleare peace and with thie brothers platsain arabs for long time with peace and under their reliogione nonot accepte other musllims to say that the land of jurasalem is thiers eccept plastain and jewsh because it hoo;y and sapose it have not to be killed or dead .


other wise jussus will came and declare war agiant st the tow.


the son of god . the price
alamir
alkhalif a

Answer 7

C!

A sovereign state was attacked by TERRORISTS who use women and children as shields and shoot rockets at Civilians in Israel.

The terrorists just have to stop killing and the battle or war is over.

THIS IS NOW SPIRITUAL WARFARE.

Answer 8

For destroying the infrastructure of southern Lebanon.

Answer 9

Amnesty intenational is known to be filled with liberal antisemetic devils promoting one world governemnt

Answer 10

and terrorist supporter and anti-us forces which is much bigger