I thought if I asked this it would balance out a this question from an ignoranus
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AobtOmy44vQHv28P6ZK8xdyKBgx.?qid=20060823135208AAcWhWR
2006-08-23 10:03:06 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
was this necessary?
2006-08-23 10:05:12 · answer #1 · answered by Nikki 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
One thing, is question did make sense a little bit. Why don't you read the best answer to see that she thinks that people arn't just on here to pick fights. Shame, you seem to be an exception to the rule.
Ok, I am a Christian. I don't know if you realised this but I also go to school, and have just completed my GCSEs. Therefore I think I am completely entitled to help people with their homework who are still in primary school for instance.
Well done you might have thought that you have balanced out the question, but you have also gained a complete lack of respect from everyone on here.
Anyway, if you are so intelligent that you have chosen the correct religion, or perhaps lack of one, why don't you a learn to speall, and choose a different name!
If you start all your question with the RR: and the have your name as The RR, The RR:, or the Religious Rambler or whatever you call yourself, do you really think that we are so unintelligent that we cannot draw links?
2006-08-25 09:29:25 · answer #2 · answered by Chris 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Christianity is not a herd or tribal belief, like many religions are. That the only allowed church during Constitines time did seek to make it such, shows how the truth cannot be hidden forever. Even with the threat of death over the rebellion leaders heads, the Bible was translated into the common tongue and distributed for all to see what was really Gods commands, and what was not. That much of what was written was altered to suit individual Popes ideas is still highly contested, but to imagine that Jesus was supposed to have said we should babtise in Gods, his and the holy spirit, before even the holy spirit was needed, is expecting clumsiness to be overlooked.
2006-08-23 17:14:52 · answer #3 · answered by Marcus R. 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ok got your point well done.
Freedom of speech for all that's what I say.
2006-08-23 17:22:55 · answer #4 · answered by Jude 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe, they were ashamed and couldn't keep up with intelligent questions asked by the Atheists.
2006-08-23 17:08:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Because they want to make sure you get the message...If you don't want that don't share your email address....Jim
2006-08-23 17:16:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would they not be allowed to answer questions on other topics? You are pitiful.
2006-08-23 17:05:36 · answer #7 · answered by Moppie098 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
This question doesn't balance out, ignoramus!
2006-08-23 17:14:48 · answer #8 · answered by Pashur 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They're the cut and paste kings aren't they
2006-08-23 17:11:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
That is your reason for asking this question? I pity you.
2006-08-23 17:11:29 · answer #10 · answered by resilience 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Really good question, saince they tend to fill each answer with copious amounts of bible quotes any way, most from revelations.
2006-08-23 17:05:19 · answer #11 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋