2006-08-23 06:57:32 · 13 answers · asked by omung_patel77 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
It all depends on Who has Nuclear Power.
Yes.....
It is a great form of Power (resource)
But I don't think it's a good Idea for a Nation, that has called for the Complete Destruction of other Nations, and Openly Supports Terrorism to have Nuclear Power.
Do you?
Besides look what happened with N. Korea during the Clinton Administration.
We negotiated a deal with them because they wanted Nuclear Power as an Energy Resource,not for Weapons.......
Yet they broke All Agreements and now have Nuclear Weapons and have claimed they will use tthem if UN Sanctions are imposed.
So, Do You think we really need another Psycho with Nuclear Weapons?
I Don't..........
But that's just my Opinion........
2006-08-23 07:26:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. Nuclear power is actually the most productive, environmentally "clean" form of energy. It is just horrible for the environment when something goes wrong, which isn't that frequent. I like to think that a clean environment promotes peace.
2006-08-23 07:04:58 · answer #2 · answered by fibr 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. It does make the power brokers nervous though. It creates an unknown variable-X.Those in power don't have control so they stir up the people to justify taking actions to give them control. I encourage all to read,watch and listen to the so called war on terror information while filtering out the emotion and heated comments then make an informed decision not a fear fanned one. Be the change. Peace.
2006-08-23 08:59:33 · answer #3 · answered by wildrover 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, people in the world threaten peace.
2006-08-26 05:48:54 · answer #4 · answered by heyrobo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are not any experts to ANY nuclear guns. yet why no longer enable them? at the same time as assessing a danger there are 2 issues to seem at: volume a million is potential and volume 2 is motive. If we enable the U.S. have nuclear guns then and enable north korea have them now why no longer Iran. no matter if Iran had the potential to attack us they haven't any motive for worry of huge scale retaliation. they do no longer have the potential as of yet and characteristic no purpose of attacking if/at the same time as they do acquire nuclear guns.
2016-11-27 00:57:27 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every one who supports Nuclear Power has not solved the problem of what to do with waste. I don't want the waste do you?
BTW, Russia has 22,000 nukes and Bush will not ask V. Putin to put them under his control for security. They are not secure now, they are not even guarded, since Russia can not pay it's troops.
2006-08-23 13:58:14 · answer #6 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No..actually it makes for more peace. We get off Iranian oil and then we can finally be done with them. I say each car should have a mini reactor already installed. Then we can run like a aircraft carrier for 15 years without a refuel...
2006-08-23 08:00:31 · answer #7 · answered by smitty031 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you watch only one conspiracy documentary ever, make it this one. This just might be the best introductory video out there. Understand that every claim made in this is fact, not opinion, no matter how wild it sounds. It's all easily verifiable through mainstream news archives and public documents.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7048572757566726569&q=Alex+Jones
2006-08-24 14:27:42 · answer #8 · answered by Sugi 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course
2006-08-23 08:13:13 · answer #9 · answered by Zen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think thats an understatement. its not so much that there is more... its who. crazy countries with crazy leaders. bent on the destruction of each other... having all that power... not a good thing
2006-08-23 07:00:59 · answer #10 · answered by pencilnbrush 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋