but have no problem seeing Satan or other evil beings depicted and referred to as male? All of these beings are spirit-beings and never held human form.
2006-08-23 06:15:01 · 20 answers · asked by kingstubborn 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Because feminists are anti male but want to have God on their side. Since Satan is referred as a him, feminists label him with men, which they hate. (lol)
2006-08-23 06:24:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
****Why do feminists insist that God is not simply male and shouldn't be depicted that way in art or language...
but have no problem seeing Satan or other evil beings depicted and referred to as male? All of these beings are spirit-beings and never held human form. ****
In its purest sense God has no gender.
God having a gender or male sexual organ is
somewhat hilarious.What would it be used for.
Males give birth to nothing. A few minutes and a
ounce or so of fluid is nothing to write home and tell momma about.
Devils,satan and evil spirits, yeah they can be males no problem.
2006-08-23 06:28:05 · answer #2 · answered by zurioluchi 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm a feminist and i know God is a spirit (thus not male or female)but i do accept God being referred to as male because we as humans live in a male dominated society and it has been this way since Adam and Eve sinned so the natural thought is to refer to any power as male, but i also realize that satan is a spirit so is also not male or female so my point is you are making a generalization about feminist , which is not true , also you might note if you are a bible reader that God is also a feminist , God is a god of justice and a feminist wants fair treatment and that includes fair laws for women as well as men and fair pay :)
2006-08-23 06:59:05 · answer #3 · answered by hi people 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
God does not have a sexual idenity- he is a diety. However, when Jesus became human, he took on the form of a man, and so Jesus shoud be depicted as a man. Whereas God the Father, could be depicted as either.
(P.S. I perfer God to be depicted as a man. Also, I believe that men and women should be treated equally, but I am not a feminist.)
2006-08-23 06:27:06 · answer #4 · answered by Maurus B. 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
God is likewise time-honored as Elohim/Eloheim. the place it says God can't be depicted in paintings is an exciting piece of information, yet i haven't considered it everywhere. Please supply e book/financial ruin/Verse. in line with probability the clarification at the back of that suggestions-set (which possibly grow to be only "suggestions-set") would have been that if people had no thought what God appeared like, they in all probability does no longer seek for Him. this could in all probability be stable for religious leaders via fact they might depict God as a guy or woman/spirit to be terrified of, or despite the leaders needed their congregation to have self belief Him to be, fairly than Him being a loving being. i think of the cultural effects is that some suited artworks depicting God have been made. I additionally think of that greater all people is prepared to share what they think of God feels like (by using paintings). people have a greater advantageous expertise of God being the stable guy or woman he's very than being somebody to concern.
2016-11-05 11:19:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Always remember that God is neither male nor female. God is Pure Spirit & is formless & can become anything. You can't depict God with any art or sth because IT is beyound our imagination. Language can only depict anything from mental or third heaven(still under the lower worlds). But God dewels far, far beyound the mental heaven(infinity). Think of this: God become man in order that man can become god. This is called grace of God... like Jesus, Mohamed, Krishna,Budder etc.
2006-08-23 06:30:20 · answer #6 · answered by Celestine N 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
God is not a physical being so has not sex. God is often portrayed as male insofar as rulers, ie kings, presidents, etc, and warriors are usually male.
As for the feminists...they're simply insane and their opinion is of little value or consequence.
2006-08-23 06:21:43 · answer #7 · answered by mzJakes 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It would seem that feminists only think
female. They don't believe in God either
or they wouldn't be feminists. Others that
don't believe in God can think that way if
they want to, but that doesn't matter, He
still was and is and will be from Alpha to
Omega.
2006-08-23 06:25:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Really good question.
I am a woman and am for EQUAL rights-- not women over men, which is what alot of these women seem to want.
I can hold my own-- I don't need better rights.
BTW, I regard God as a Father, which stricly speaking is male-- but He is so much more than any gender can explain.
2006-08-23 06:19:57 · answer #9 · answered by Lisa the Pooh 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Everything that is heterosexually male is evil. Turds wrote the bible. So, it must be bad (just like milk has gone bad in the refrigerator after overstaying its welcome there for so long -- How do we put up with you? That's right. I don't. I leave the filth to the housekeeping whores.), and everything in it must be contradicted and dismissed. Therefore, God is a lesbian. She is indeed a woman! And She loves only women, and the occasional good guy. Deal with it, you apple-sucking goons! She's a WOMAN!
2006-08-23 06:29:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋