2006-08-23 06:13:15 · 12 answers · asked by a flower 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Painting
yes it is possible, it is just not civilized
2006-08-23 11:49:43 · answer #1 · answered by Pablo 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
1) Art is an interpretation and/or an appreciation of a created object, whether a mark in the sand, on a cave or on a canvas, or a pile of stones or a marble sculpture. 2) Life cannot help but change its environment in some way. That leaves open the possibility that someone may discover markings and appreciate them and/or the maker. Art certainly cannot exist without life, but life (and I will now limit this discussion to human life) cannot help but make things that at some point in their existence will be interpreted or appeciated for what it is not. (If the mark is a scratch but was not intended to be a representation or interpretation, it is only a scratch,. But if that scratch was made with the ourpose of representing something else, or being seen as something else, then it has taken on the at least one of the attributes of art. So, life cannot exist without making art. It certainly can exist without interpreting markings but very unlikely. since we cannot even look at the sky without seeing mythological figures (constellations),or faces in the clouds. Our nature is to make order out of chaos...so we are always interpreting and appreciating.
2006-08-24 04:42:44 · answer #2 · answered by Victor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is art possible without life?
2006-08-23 13:32:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Define Art?......sometimes natural...really most of the time ..has produced the best art....in short,,,life is art.
2006-08-23 16:18:30 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
possible..... but some say without art, things would be very, very different...... and not in a good way.
2006-08-23 14:42:32 · answer #5 · answered by steelmadison 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
art is all around us, the chairs, the computers, carpet, dressors.. someone created it, therefor its art. so no life as we know it isnt possible without it.
2006-08-23 13:16:22 · answer #6 · answered by cats4ever2k1 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What kind of life would it be? Would you want to live it? I know I wouldn't since I write stories and paint, etc.. To me, it would be drab and with no passion.
2006-08-23 13:14:39 · answer #7 · answered by Elizabeth S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, it is. God knows a lot of people live without it... they're also dull as dishwater!
2006-08-23 13:17:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
only for the most boring and insipid. i.e. most politicians and corporate "bigwigs". and probably , as well, for many republicans and fundamentalists. :-)hhhmmmmm. and most definitely for just about all nascar fans.
2006-08-23 13:17:39 · answer #9 · answered by drakke1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes but it would be a meaningless life
2006-08-23 13:15:23 · answer #10 · answered by denise e 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No!
Not even surviving!
2006-08-25 15:23:06 · answer #11 · answered by soubassakis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋