Should these controvertial names be encouraged as they show support for war on terror and should Israel be asked to take unilateral decision to bomb this eatery, incase India adminstration is unable to do so
2006-08-23 05:56:07 · 17 answers · asked by Jonu S 2 in Dining Out ➔ India ➔ Mumbai
Bombing this or any other eatery just because the name is grossly offensive would be wrong. The best response is for people to not patronize the establishment. Eventually the owner will either get the message and change the name or close down. Protests would be in order; while they will surely create publicity for the restaurant, it will also raise awareness among Indians and tourists. But bombs--no.
I personally would not eat there no matter how excellent the fare or who invited me. What Hitler and the Nazis did should never be forgotten, but naming a restaurant after one of the world's most egregious mass murderers sends the wrong message.
2006-08-23 10:31:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah, I remember listening to Bob and Tom on the radio yesterday and they mentioned this restaurant. I thought it was a joke for a minute....appalling isn't the word for this idea.
But *and I do not mean for this to be a joke*..you know how in a restaurant the hostess will call out *for example* "Miller...Party of three" or "Jones' Party. I wonder how long it would take some wise *** to give his name as Nazi...Nazi Party of four or whatever
2006-08-23 08:16:09 · answer #2 · answered by starikotasukinomiko 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler , as per the history he was bruital. but the same name has been named by someone with good attitude also. but we always talk about negative aspect only. be positive ,it just a name. and a business like restaurant are just for a ad .
2006-08-23 06:09:09 · answer #3 · answered by sixer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in business every thing is money, though hitler is notorious, he is popular, a new business requires to be instantly popularity, they can try any cheap means to get it. MORALLY, HUMANELY IT OFFENDS EVERY ONE, but it depends on place / location wher ir it is kept such as places people who are not directly affected & who treat his attrocities as jus a story,in india they are more offended by the hear of word british rule rather than hitler, leave out hitler, u can find ample incidence of such cheap things in day to day business,
2006-08-23 06:18:47 · answer #4 · answered by madhava k 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whoever names a restaurant after Hitler is sickeningly ignorant.
2006-08-23 09:40:04 · answer #5 · answered by PoliSciFi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No rational person could support such a restaraunt, though bombing the eatery is no solution either.
2006-08-23 06:02:53 · answer #6 · answered by Letz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The restaurant is not promoting Hitler. But it's trying to tell people it is different in the way as Hitler was different.
2006-08-23 06:02:37 · answer #7 · answered by rx.vinay.ph 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certainly not.
The name recalls dark memories of the Hitler regime which are best forgotten.
2006-08-23 06:07:56 · answer #8 · answered by yadu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You shouldn't outlaw them because you find them offensive (unless they are extremely explainative, i.e. The Rape Factory or something).
The easy way to deal with companies like that is not to do business with them. Ignore them and they will go out of business, fight them and you make them more popular.
2006-08-23 06:02:16 · answer #9 · answered by Dr. Brian 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if it serves good food i don't mind naming it anything. we should never judge a thing by its appearance. so let judge the restaurent by food and leave all rest for mankind.
2006-08-23 06:17:19 · answer #10 · answered by dilipagr_2000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋