21grams..thats how much weight our bodies lose when death occurs....so they reckon..
2006-08-23 04:08:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by delboy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
someway I fairly doubt, given the present paradigm and state of lack of expertise, that we will confine the Soul in any particular set of words. in view that we've rather no words to even talk such issues we could desire to assume that there is a few correspondence between the transcendent and the worldly. If there is, then we could draw some conclusions regarding the elegant according to our understand-how of the mundane and on the words we use to talk it. that's all we've, different than for people who've direct (or mystical) experience to share. From what I even have seen they use words like ineffable, and don't possibly help outline the strategies in any respect. even with the shown fact that, that begs the question. In my humble opinion it makes plenty greater experience to first be open to a paradigm shift, because of the fact the previous one merely looks too lame to be triumphant. If it worked, then we would have solved this already. I even tend to accept as true with Christianity, yet never interior the form contemporary in maximum contemporary formalized religions. i think of there are some key factors to evaluate. i visit offer them, then take a seat and close up. a million. awareness IS. that's no longer led to by innovations interest, yet is very itself the grand unified field of Einstein. it may or won't be an characteristic of the writer, even with the shown fact that it is the substrate or medium we exist in, and previous this i won't have the capacity to assert. The mundane exists interior the sector of awareness and expresses itself by way of situation and interior the path of the minds of persons. If the innovations is broken then purely the expression of that ingredient of awareness is altered. 2. there is completely one awareness. 3. The transcendent is by definition exterior the international. Kabbalah calls it Ain Soph, and the tree is a image of how we've been given into this mess, no longer a manner out (yet i'm quite ignorant right here.) 4. look at Quantum Physics. 5. we are in reality non secular beings, immortal, sensible and all factors of the comparable ingredient, no longer organic and organic creatures of finite lifespan and extremely almost negligible understand-how and vast bias. None of that's new stuff. It has all been shouted from mountaintops, then rapidly subverted, distorted, and many times forgotten. that's available everywhere for those keen to seek for.
2016-12-11 13:45:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
The soul is an abstract concept.
I think the closest physical analogy is with the body as an organisation of complex processes, the organisation being the abstract property of all the atoms and molecules making up all of our cells.
Out of this organisation arises all of our fundamental needs and desires which make up who we are, at the level below that which is socially conditioned.
Meditation enables access to this level of our being, but it takes regular practice over a period of time.
2006-08-23 04:14:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My body is very light (115lbs) but my soul is heavy with the burden of carrying around my neverending despair and misery.....
2006-08-23 04:19:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cute But Evil 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it is weightless. But it carries all our thoughts all our good deeds and all our love.
2006-08-23 04:10:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by blank 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
if it did, mankind would be able to prove its existence
2006-08-23 04:10:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Just_A_Boy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ermmm ... i dont think so ... coz ur body has mass ..... ! so ur soul wont have one...... i dont knw .. i dont think so it has
2006-08-23 05:05:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by sandras 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it doesn't. You're being silly. :)
2006-08-23 04:07:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
srry but no.
2006-08-23 04:22:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by i SHiNE SO BRiGHTLi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-08-23 04:06:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋