I was given an answer after the test, but I wanted everyone else's opinion.
2006-08-22 23:06:08 · 11 answers · asked by Velociraptor 5 in Education & Reference ➔ Other - Education
I second the opinion that many of the responses show little or no understanding of IQ scores. Internet tests are not reliable and count for very little. Just look at other IQ-related questions on this website and you'd think that a 120 was below average (most people say they've got 130 or higher). I've gotten scores that vary by as many as 45 points (3 standard deviations). You should have your IQ measured by a professional if you want to get an accurate assessment. Also keep in mind that IQ scores are not necessarily a measure of actual intelligence, and are influenced by socioeconomic and other factors.
Assuming your score held up on a properly constructed and administered IQ test, a score of 127 is almost 2 standard deviations above the mean of 100, so you would be within the top 10% (or better) of the population.
2006-08-23 00:00:30 · answer #1 · answered by phaedra 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
IQ tests on the internet are not able to assess your true knowledge of certain areas that are mandatory for an accurate evaluation. However, an IQ of 127 is above average since 100 is the standard score given for an average level of knowledge. Also, a person's IQ usually cannot be adequately tested until that person is at least sixteen years of age, and our IQ's do not get higher as we grow older... actually most people's IQ's tend to drop a few points.
2006-08-22 23:20:03 · answer #2 · answered by Laurie V 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
An IQ is an intellignece quotient, i think that's a hundred x score on try/age. the greater youthful you're, the better that's to get an more suitable score. because of this actuality, no longer many places use IQ assessments anymore. think approximately a seventy 5 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous who's fairly clever, yet has a low IQ via fact of the variety of severe age. i think the typical is a hundred, so sure, 114 is robust. something 70 or under is seen mentally retarded, and something one hundred thirty or above is seen genius.
2016-11-05 10:45:10 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if its an internet test then that's not accurate
but yes 127 is very good
100 is normal and 160 is supergenius
2006-08-22 23:08:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. Its a standard rating. If you really want to be tested accuratly, do not expect the internet to determine your score.
2006-08-22 23:14:08 · answer #5 · answered by Marcus R. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on how old u r.. for example, if you are 12 and your IQ's 135, it's considered not bad... If you're 29 and your IQ is 136, there's a problem with you... normally, your IQ should be 140-170 at such a big age...
2006-08-22 23:09:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
All the above answers are ******** except the first one. I don't know why people answer when they don't have a clue
2006-08-22 23:14:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry,I couldn't tell you.My IQ is 12 and so. . .
I've already forgotten the question!
2006-08-22 23:12:41 · answer #8 · answered by moebiusfox 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup. If you took it from the internet, it isn't very credible.
2006-08-22 23:13:21 · answer #9 · answered by Redeemer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mine's 140 so you're good.
2006-08-22 23:11:47 · answer #10 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋