English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

1: As to Dark Phonix
i think and believe that if non-military funds and supports military/governament/groups to attach other countries/leader across the world/public than attacking such non-military targets can be allowed as us had attacked in Afghanistan/Sudan before even 9/11. And As US and british are doing againest sham and iran that they are funding groups of terrorism(i like them as freedom fighters).

Haveing said that attacking non-military targets fund military may be allowed.



2:- as i don't khnow

I challenge you to bring me one single line from Quran that says to enslaves the world. instead i must tell you that Islam Gives Equal Rights to All People around the World. and Islam Does not make any differance in black /white or whatever.
This is a mistake to say that Islam leads to enslave the world.

As for as your Question Lisa

see, i belong to Pakistan, and if i look back into 1900-47, you will see how combined India-Pakistani People fights againest British to get freedom, we India-Pakistan call those people freedom fighers and British named them terrorist and that time. Now, the British also accept that they were freeedom fighters.

Any every Healthy Human, it is must that he defand himself, his family and his homeland from invaders, And as for as Muslims, Quran says you must fights againest injustice, help weak people to get justice. i am glad, Muslism are the only people who work for justice for themself and help others to get justice.

To conclude, Fighting for selfdetermanation and adainest injuce is NOT TERRORISM.

2006-08-23 17:27:26 · answer #1 · answered by OrangeApple 5 · 0 0

It most definitely could be. Does the perpetrator of injustice rule with an iron fist and make any level of self determination impossible - like Saddam did to the Kurds in the north or like Russia tried to do with Afghanistan?

In the case of the Iraqi insurgents they have peaceful avenues available to them; but they choose to engage in terrorism instead....that is terrorism.

2006-08-22 17:16:56 · answer #2 · answered by netjr 6 · 0 0

Lisa your grammar give you away. You can not justify terrorism with false excuses. Otherwise I could say that killing Muslims was a fight for self determination because Islam wants to enslave the whole world (the Qran says so) and the only way to prevent that is to eliminate Islam.

One excuse flying out the window....................

2006-08-22 17:22:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Attacking non-military targets in order to create fear in the general populace is terrorism.

It doesn't matter if you're doing it against injustice.

2006-08-22 17:16:50 · answer #4 · answered by dark_phoenix 4 · 0 0

No. Absolutely not. Terrorism is just that: terrorism. It is random, criminal attacks against innocent people to promote chaos and weaken their ability to defend themselves.

2006-08-22 17:17:02 · answer #5 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0 0

i dont know-sorry

2006-08-22 17:14:28 · answer #6 · answered by hanifrng 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers