English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Instead of closing the borders, spending more money to deport, feed, ect. all illegals, why dont we spend all those billions to put a welfare system, medicaid, ect. ect. in their country so they dont want to leave or dont want to come here. In my mind it would be so much easier and really we wouldnt be spending any less money but a lot less time trying to deport ect. Then we would also know the ones that stayed did so because they truly love the U.S. and want to be here. Just a thougth.

2006-08-22 12:28:39 · 9 answers · asked by humorme! 3 in Politics & Government Immigration

9 answers

Nope, don't want to send all my tax dollars to mexico. Thanks anyways.'

2006-08-22 12:34:22 · answer #1 · answered by Bluealt 7 · 1 1

A good thought but I think if you add medical and welfare to Mexico, they would take advantage of it there as they do here. They wouldn't better themselves this way. I think this would end up being a bigger lost. But I do agree that the Mexican government needs to come up with some plan because this is why immigrants are coming to the US.

2006-08-22 12:37:16 · answer #2 · answered by Sydney 4 · 2 0

exciting thought, however the inevitable result could be a shooting conflict with China. we've more suitable into some form of wierd symbiotic courting with them. they choose us to purchase their crap, and we choose them to refill Wal-Mart. If the answer to the project grow to be that easy, it could have already been carried out. in line with probability interior the long-term, a conflict with China is inevitable besides. we are already extraordinarily close to to a "chilly conflict" with them. it could start up out as a "commerce conflict" The spark is Taiwan. in the event that they ever attempt to take returned administration of Taiwan, then the tip is close to. China is the only usa on earth with adequate ability to compete economically with u . s . a . and Europe. loose commerce prevents wars. that's the base line. via fact of this all our "leaders" have accompanied a loose commerce settlement with China, even to our very own financial detriment. Our concern is that our grasping company freaks can no longer see the long term income of conserving the producing right here interior the u . s . a .. All they see is a thank you to make a speedy greenback for themselves. The chinese language have a existence-style of making plans forward for generations. via fact of this they're nonetheless going stable inspite of Communism. enable's settle for it. China is the subsequent "Superpower" interior the international, and it will never be their first time on the recreation. no longer something is going to end that. I say enable them to have it. they are able to police the international in the event that they like to. Then in line with probability the freaks will see them via fact the subsequent "super devil" fairly people. i could be prepared to renounce my HDTV for that.

2016-11-05 10:08:51 · answer #3 · answered by lurette 4 · 0 0

People don't come here to life off welfare.
Your Afroamerican ghettos are the ones who usually live off welfare.

2006-08-22 12:51:46 · answer #4 · answered by bunt 3 · 0 1

except.... illegals aren't here for welfare and medicaid.......

they are here for a better life..... they are tired of working sixty hours a week and not making enough money to feed their families in their own countries!!!!!!!!!! so they come here work their A SSes off to provide cheap labor for the small businesses and corporations who illegally hire them to create products and services for ALL Americans to enjoy!!!!!!!

2006-08-22 12:35:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Bad idea, they wouldn't use it for that, all the top officials would get it.

2006-08-22 12:37:00 · answer #6 · answered by hexa 6 · 1 0

Are you crazy or just stupid? We have our own problems that are lacking the finances they need.

2006-08-22 12:41:57 · answer #7 · answered by BORED AT WORK 5 · 0 1

Because they want to work not be on wealfare.

2006-08-22 12:31:23 · answer #8 · answered by gidget lil bit 4 · 0 2

That's all we need.........we can't even take care of our elderly.

2006-08-22 12:33:32 · answer #9 · answered by Yes & No 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers