English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think it should be, it should be our own decision

2006-08-22 08:37:43 · 46 answers · asked by martin 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

46 answers

Yes on children, except of course for rare medical conditions that compel it. If an adult want to mutilate himself fine, but we should not permit parents to permanently mutilate their children needlessly.

2006-08-22 08:44:22 · answer #1 · answered by lenny 7 · 5 0

This is a religious issue, or an opinion issue at best. You can't outlaw religious practices that don't negatively affect the health of a child. If you do that, every Jew (and many Christians) in the country will have to either abandon their faith or become outlaws.

If it bothers you so much, you should invest your money in research to develop a prosthetic foreskin for the poor victims of over-zealous, penis-snipping parents. Maybe Bill and Melinda Gates would be interested in funding it.

2006-08-22 08:56:19 · answer #2 · answered by thelanguageguy 2 · 1 2

Not outlawed but discouraged in the non Jewish population, how come all you "Christians" are not saying "It was put there by God so it should stay"? You are all hypocrites and pick and choose what you want to believe in.
There are NO medical benefits to circumcision, it was originally done by non-Jewish people to discourage masturbation. The hospitals have a vested interest in keeping people circumcising their baby boys as it makes them so much money

2006-08-22 11:14:01 · answer #3 · answered by n2mustaches 4 · 2 2

Well, except for Jewish males, it's a pretty optional practice. In America, I think people do it as a matter of aesthetics, and because it's easier to teach a boy to keep himself clean without the foreskin there- it increses the risk of infection in a child not mature enough to understand yet. But only in the Jewish community is it still a requirement under their religious law, and in fact some Jewish couples have begun to break from that tradition for all sorts of reasons.

If you're having a baby boy, what you do in terms of his anatomy is a decision only you and your wife can make.

2006-08-22 08:45:46 · answer #4 · answered by Robin J. Sky 4 · 2 2

Well it is barbaric and there is no clinical reason to do it.

There is the health argument but if you take care of yourself Im sure it wouldnt be an issue at all. Many studies have shown that there is no benifit to it whatsoever. In fact they say that sex is much more pleasurable for people who havent had it done.


There is an issue with it though (and also with some of the methods used to do it).

If I was to have a kid and my religion dictated that I tattoo the kid once he was born Im sure I would be thrown in prison for child abuse - however if your religion dictates that you physically mutulate your child its a non-issue. Eventhough, later in life the kid could have the tattoo removed, yet not have the circumsision reversed.

It is barbaric, abusive and just wrong when you think about it.

Some moils (sp?) actually ritualistically suck (YES - SUCK) the blood from the kids penis during the circumsision. If thats not blatent child/sexual abuse I dont know what is!

2006-08-22 08:43:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

If you would like to wait until you are an adult to be circumcised and go through three days of unmentionable pain, then be my guest. I am glad my parents had me circumcised when I was a newborn---and I am not Jewish. It seems to me that your desire to have circumcision outlawed might be anti-Semitic. Jesus loves you.

2006-08-22 08:47:48 · answer #6 · answered by Preacher 6 · 2 3

A Jewish boy is normally circumcised when he is 8 days old.

I am 7 days old and I agree with you...............


PS Actually, when it's done at that age. 3 days later it's all healed up.
The guy that did me did a wonderful job - it fits anything!

2006-08-22 08:46:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Sure.
Right.
You and Abraham...waiting until you're old enough to cut off your own foreskin.
Mega *ouch*!!!

Look, if you really want it back, there are procedures that are available.
But since it's your parents decision, what are you gonna do?
Sue?

Besides, circumcised boys usually have a lower risk of notable diseases.
Read the link and learn.

2006-08-22 08:50:30 · answer #8 · answered by docscholl 6 · 1 4

in a way, its good for you. its more sanitary. but i understand what your saying....it should be your own decision. most get circumcised when still a young baby. but if forced when a young child...then yes, it should be outlawed. either should be done as a baby with parents concent or an adult with their own concent.

2006-08-22 08:46:47 · answer #9 · answered by slipknot_132004 4 · 2 3

i presumed I could factor out- male circumcision grow to be initially designed to regulate male sexuality besides- on the turn of the century circumcision got here into trend as a "treatment" for male masturbation, which grow to be seen a foul ailment. Even the Jewish logician Maimonides stated that male circumcision controls the sexuality of the male, making his organ much less comfortable and therefor permitting him to be a greater advantageous Jewish husband to his spouse. we could get our information without postpone. i think of that that's a case of "civilised" individuals looking down on the "barbaric" african undesirable. the fact is that male toddlers are shrink without anesthetic, outdoors of sterile working theaters interior america daily. and many of them have undesirable ingredient consequences, severe scarring, loss of component of the glans or the full penis, removal of a few distance too lots dermis, MRSA infections and greater. And thats only in u . s . a .! In Africa and many different areas of the international boys and youthful adult adult males are certainly shrink with rusty knifes in little airborne dirt and dust huts and a few of them DIE from the technique. Heck, in areas of India they DO turn adult adult males into Eunuchs, yet nobodys up in hands over that. i think of they're the two the two reprehensible. the excuses they're taken care of in yet in a distinctive way are social, boys and ladies are considered in yet in a distinctive way and individuals do no longer prefer to admit that no longer only have THEY been hamred, yet they're actively doing injury to their babies. in case you ask Africans WHY they shrink their ladies they're going to cite the suited same motives that WE shrink our boys- it fairly is cleanser, lady genitals are grimy, it grow to be carried out to the mummy and she or he would not suggestions, adult adult males like shrink ladies greater advantageous and so on and so on females's rights are huge matters with the universal public suited now, mens rights to act like people and not as stereotypical adult adult males have been sluggish to capture up. -Neb

2016-11-05 09:47:25 · answer #10 · answered by overbay 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers