neither i'd rather use a bicycle or motorbike.
Buses run late, trains stink of urine and run late
or is that just us in the UK that have that experience
2006-08-21 22:43:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Monty 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Train
2006-08-21 22:40:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by alti 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Train.
2006-08-21 22:41:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Clyde Frog 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trains.
2006-08-21 22:44:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bus. What's a train?
2006-08-21 22:41:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Megatrain.com makes journeys to the South West, Birmingham to Southampton and NW of Britain - as well as Northumberland very cheap.
Trains are the best way to get around but only if you can shoulder the cost. Tube or trams are good and cheaper.
Otherwise buses are the only option for many without an enormous pocket. Investigate express coaches too!
2006-08-22 06:33:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rosamund G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is that supposed to be a question? Bus or trains what? Which is faster? Bigger? More economical?
The answer is on page 26.
2006-08-21 22:41:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Taxedman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's got to be the train; Generally on time, access to refreshments and decent loos and sooooo much quicker.
They sometimes also have access to powerpoints for mobiles and powerpoints and decent leg room.
Going by bus is always a last ditch option.
2006-08-21 22:42:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Felidae 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trains are quicker and I do like them but they are a lot more expensive than a bus. I take my everyday journey by bus to my destination and it costs me £2.50 however if I did it by tr ain it would cost £7.00. I also think Travelcards are too expensive on trains!. What do you think?
2006-08-23 05:52:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on destination from portsmouth to london train, but for local all else bus
2006-08-21 22:43:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by pete 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bus is usually cheaper. Trains are more comfortable and quicker.
2006-08-21 23:34:38
·
answer #11
·
answered by mel 3
·
0⤊
0⤋