http://www.harunyahya.com/m_audio_detail.php?api_id=1384
click to listen free
2006-08-21 19:11:52 · 9 answers · asked by hghghghgh 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No I have not.
Solves all the questions about fate?
Good question.
2006-08-21 19:18:08 · answer #1 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
extremely Bravo? Gore may not have used the great phrasing on some products, yet I bear in mind climatologists responding to that case, affirming the movie frequently were given it precise, and the choose made some inaccurate and incomplete factors. Like on the sea element statement, Gore did not supply a time body, in ordinary words exhibiting what could ensue with significant ice sheet disintegration. even with the undeniable fact that the choose apparently neglected the AR4 qualifiers indicating that there is uncertainty concerning dynamic ice sheet techniques (which have already produced extra replace than projected), and that sea element upward push more effective than the authentic estimates is available. The choose says Gore asserts an "precise extra healthful" between temperature and CO2 over glacial-interglacial cycles. inaccurate. Gore known that the courting contained in the ice cores is complicated (it includes feedbacks). He did not declare that the ice retreat on Mt. Kilimanjaro is only via international warming (even even with the undeniable fact that analyze would not look to help the dominance of different consequences previous the early 1900's). yet his get mutually is a glacier this is survived a minimum of 12,000 years through droughts, and represents what's taking position to maximum folk of glaciers global. The choose also said that Gore "ascribed" Katrina to international warming, even as it became used as an get mutually of something detrimental that warming can impact the intensity of. etc. That stated, Al Gore isn't a scientist - he's purely one individual talking on a topic he's outwardly been attracted to for a lengthy time period. he's certain to lack countless the clinical precision and nuance, purely as media comments frequently do. this is as a lot as us to seem into the documents and extra totally ensure the region previous the quick rundown it really is AIT.
2016-11-30 23:40:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it doesn't.
In the first few minutes, I heard at least two non-sequiturs presented as irrefutable logic. The first was that the Big Bang means that matter was created from "nothing". The second was that acknowledging the creation of matter has to mean also accepting a creator-God, and thus having to follow "his religion" (Islam, in other words).
The basis of this message appears to be the Koran, which the speaker mentioned twice in the first few minutes.
To know the truth means to recognize it when you see it, and to recognize not-truth as well.
2006-08-21 19:30:00 · answer #3 · answered by Baxter 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey did you know that life can disappear with the fall of Religion. Yeah, life will become dull and boring, because Religion isn't the only thing that's full of crap.
2006-08-21 19:20:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh . Another one of those types of books. Read enough of them and you might stumble onto a grain of truth.
2006-08-21 19:18:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is only what is.
Listen to that for free.
2006-08-21 19:22:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will not click it you can not make me .....haha victory is mine
2006-08-21 19:17:17 · answer #7 · answered by simplehoneylove 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
2006-08-21 19:16:12 · answer #8 · answered by tammidee10 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no I have not
2006-08-21 19:19:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋