English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

when it can be used to fight terrorist in afganistan and iraq. when was the last time a mexican bombed anywhere in the u.s.a? Mc
Veigh in Oklahoma was a white boy.

2006-08-21 18:43:47 · 19 answers · asked by QUE PASA?? 3 in Politics & Government Immigration

19 answers

Uhh... ya, you don't have any sense do you? You seriously don't recognize how much this issue means to National Security?

You're more moronic than I thought...

By the way, open an English book, you could brush up a little bit on your spelling as well.

----Or use spell check...

--Rob :)

2006-08-21 20:32:44 · answer #1 · answered by stealth_n700ms 4 · 4 0

What money are you talking about? All of our money being spent on illegal aliens is going to their free health care, free education, room and board in prison, food stamps, war on drugs, etc... It is estimated that letting illegals stay in the United States costs citizens around $100 billion a year. I wish we would spend some money to rid ourselves of this problem. With open borders, who is to say that terrorists wont come over and bomb us. We got to stop all access for terrorist possible. It isn't just about Mexicans

2006-08-21 18:59:21 · answer #2 · answered by Derek M 2 · 3 0

The National Alliance is America’s premiere neo-Nazi group that may have inspired the Oklahoma City bombing. Based in West Virginia, the Alliance is headed by William Pierce, the author of The Turner Diaries, under the nom de plume of Andrew Macdonald. The novel, which approvingly describes a bloody revolution against Jews, blacks and "race-mixers," was employed by Timothy McVeigh as a blueprint for the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and has become a Bible to many on the international radical right.

2006-08-21 20:06:01 · answer #3 · answered by helena2581 2 · 0 4

unlawful immigration motives many issues that's for particular. that's an undeniable actuality. Given your estimate of 20 million illegals enable's proceed from there. enable's say even a million/3 of them are conserving jobs. that's only approximately 7 million people interior the artwork tension. Contributing to the tax base and so on. which could go away 7 million interest vacancies. could our usa be waiting to deal with that many leaving the artwork tension? in all probability no longer. could individuals step into those jobs for the pay presented? in all probability no longer. companies base line is income. could they develop wages to get individuals to artwork those jobs? in all probability no longer. greater companies could start to outsource. for this reason leaving many individuals out of jobs that now carry jobs. Our entire usa could give way and the super melancholy could appear as if a cakewalk. As i've got reported unlawful immigration is faulty and needs to end. yet we additionally would desire to be real looking on deporting as you're saying 20 million people. have self belief me...it is not going to ensue for countless motives. So we could flow forward and picture of real looking the right thank you to handle the area handy and additionally insure the unlawful project is stemmed interior the destiny. greater advantageous border protection and visa structures would desire to be taken care of first and suited so the area would not steadily worsen. as quickly as the bypass is stopped we are able to then artwork on what to do with those already right here.

2016-11-05 08:54:21 · answer #4 · answered by sturms 4 · 0 0

bush is willing to spend billions of dollars so americans will forget that they have their 18-19 year old kids out in iraq... so americans can focus on the real problems like illegal immigrants. open ur eyes folks, r u really afraid that an illegal immigrant is going to take ur job? and if so, maybe u need to quit ur job as a grape picker or pool man and finish ur high high school education. next thing u know they r going to start blaming illegal immigrants for high gass prices and high electricity bills

2006-08-22 00:38:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Because it costs a lot more to have them here. Los Angeles County alone spent $1 Billion dollars for services for illegal immigrants last year, and that doesn't count the state and federal funds for the same people.

Worse, our schools are over crowded and most of the money goes to ESL programs which are very expensive. That means it is not just us but our children who are paying the price with their futures, and that price is far too high.

2006-08-21 18:51:22 · answer #6 · answered by DAR 7 · 3 2

Below is a sample of homeland security items
in the FY2007 Budget,
their estimated costs,
and the time it takes the Pentagon to burn through
the same amount in Iraq.

* 1,500 new Border Patrol agents:
$459 million ($306,000 per agent)
Iraq spending equivalent: 1.9 days

* Container Security Initiative (CSI)
to pre-screen U.S.-bound cargo
at more than 40 foreign ports:
$139 million
Iraq spending equivalent: 13.9 hours.

* An additional 6,700 Detention Bed Spaces
to replace “catch and release” with a “catch and return” policy:
$410 million.
Iraq spending equivalent: 1.7 days

* An enhanced Worksite Enforcement program
to “send a strong deterrence message to employers
who knowingly hire illegal workers…”:
$41.7 million
Iraq spending equivalent: 4.2 hours

* Border technology to enhance electronic surveillance:
$100 million
Iraq spending equivalent: 10 hours

* 18 additional Fugitive Operations teams (raising the total to 70)
dedicated to catching the estimated 450,000 individuals
who have absconded following their deportation orders:
$30 million
Iraq spending equivalent: 10 hours

* Completion of the San Diego Border Infrastructure System,
including multiple fences and patrol roads:
$30 million
Iraq spending equivalent: 3 hours

And now for the grand finale.
Although this last item is the Most costly,
it may yield one of the biggest benefits.

After the first 10 miles of border fence was completed,
arrests of illegal immigrants
trying to cross the San Diego border sector plummeted
from about 25,000 per year to 3,000 per year.
But of course the San Diego fence
pushed the illegal influx eastward,
into the (less hospitable) Arizona desert.

A serious commitment to border security
would require fencing off the entire southern border—
all 1,891 miles of it.
(For comparison, we have 40,000 miles of Interstate highways.)

At $1.7 million per mile
(the cost of the first 10 mile stretch in San Diego),
the entire U.S.-Mexican border (all 1,891 miles of it)
could be sealed off for $3.3 billion dollars.
Iraq spending equivalent: 13.8 days.

Cost / benefit analysis, anyone?

2006-08-21 18:58:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

No they use enough money on war. Lets save all the money we use on illegal aliens and use it for the people here. So many citizens are poor and sick and want a better life. They need the money for their families. And if we save enough that we are putting out on others who don't belong here-maybe we can help them. Wouldn't that be great.

2006-08-21 19:38:31 · answer #8 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 6 0

So much money is spent because America isn't playing games. They seriously want them gone. Sorry but it's the truth.

2006-08-22 02:10:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because they cost so much money to the US tax payers. Same as ANY poor person or family does. We have plenty of poor families here already, we don't need more.

2006-08-21 20:45:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers