English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

The U.S doesn't recognize or adhere to international law, If we need to invade a country we make it a law saying we can do so.

2006-08-21 16:21:40 · answer #1 · answered by chubbiguy40 4 · 1 1

With Canda's help, we legally invade Mexico every Spring Break. But seriously, as far as the Bush Administration is concerned, we legally invaded Iraq insomuchas we had the full support of Congress. On the other hand, if you're from Iraq or any other country in the Middle East for that matter - we're like the Vikings: lawless savages. It's all a matter of perspective, if you ask me...

2006-08-21 16:14:51 · answer #2 · answered by groucho_smith 3 · 1 1

The U.S. has no precise ot invade any united states of america a lot less Mexico, one in each of this is correct trading companions. Mexico provides a large portion of the petroleum the U.S. consumes. Mexico is a loose Democracy not a dictatorship. The U.S. would not favor to invade Mexico to "fix" this is authorities. As for the drug concern, I agree that something desires to be executed about it; even with the undeniable fact that it really is going to be the Mexican those who treatment the region. they have a situation with corrupt officials over there and they prefer to opt for extra constructive ones, the region is they don't have an excellent determination as maximum officials in Mexico are corrupt. this is problem-free information.

2016-11-30 23:30:32 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

FIRST....The United States did not and has not, EVER, invaded Iraq. The United NATIONS, with over 145 countries as members (including Iraq), voted to take military action against Iraq because of their invasion of neighboring Kuwait.

You must not forget that the 1991 U.N. "Gulf War" was never ended and Hussein stalled the U.N. for over a decade before they had the balls to go back in and finish the original job. The current occupation is simply a continuation of the 1991 action because Iraq and Hussein never lived up to the conditions of the cease fire, the U.N. imposed restrictions, etc.

Hitler did much the same as Hussein before world war II. He ignored the treaty of Versaille's and rearmed under the noses of those who told him he couldn't. When he had armed himself sufficiently, he tore up the treaty and began his little war. Thankfully, the U.N. has stopped Hussein from being the next Hitler.

NOTE: The U.N. is a multinational organization composed of over 145 signatory "member" countries....HOWEVER.....THe United States, Russian, and Brittain pretty much have the power and drive the policies....even if the U.N. doesn't do much with those policies.

2006-08-21 19:39:01 · answer #4 · answered by StaffSergeant C 2 · 0 1

Hell....Why not the Mexicans are already invading this country....why not return a gesture of invading there country before they complete their invasion of ours!

Heck i am all for invading Mexico and Canada and making them both part of America.......The United States of North America!

2006-08-21 16:31:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Legally invade Iraq? I wasnt aware that any Iraqi court had ruled that their country could be invaded. Thats why its all the more criminal and especially since Iraq did nothing against us to warrant our invasion. Not to mention all of the Iraqi people killed for what?

2006-08-21 16:11:21 · answer #6 · answered by worriedaboutyou 4 · 1 1

Actually, the *real* question is, "If the US can legally invade Iraq, can China legally invade the US?"

Personally, I think we need their help for a regime change...

2006-08-21 16:09:52 · answer #7 · answered by ceprn 6 · 0 1

I wish we would invade Mexico so the Mexicans would already be in our country and not have to cross the boarders.

Pilachi don't seem to realize Mexico is rich in natural resources. It's the corrupt government that makes it poor.

2006-08-21 16:09:35 · answer #8 · answered by chupakabra123 5 · 2 1

We didnt legally invade Iraq.

2006-08-21 16:08:54 · answer #9 · answered by Phil S 5 · 1 2

I think you'll find that most countries are getting along very well without you, although Canada's right wing dictatorship could be conceived as a threat. Steven Harper's use of poison gas on his own population and designs on nuclear technologies and weapons of mass destruction may very well justify invasion. Perhaps you should right to your congressman and suggest it.

2006-08-21 17:55:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers