English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What proof is there that we evolved? someone just answered a question by saying "there is no proof of anything other then evovlution" The bible is proof that Jesus live.

2006-08-21 15:33:06 · 15 answers · asked by ginaorregina 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

15 answers

Why don't you google it or look back on the other 100 questions people asked similar to yours. No one cares you catholic nut licking butt pirate. No scientist ever tried to disprove jesus' existence, they agree he lived. He just wasnt the man the bible made him seem. So get your facts straight, thanks.

2006-08-21 15:40:00 · answer #1 · answered by buttcheeks 3 · 1 3

You of course have not examine one e book on evolution because of the fact in case you have you does no longer be answering this question. the assumption of evolution is a scientific theory. Why do no longer creationists get that for the time of their heads. i are not getting it. there is plenty evidence of evolution accessible, yet human beings elect to no longer settle for it. Why?!?! that's merely some thing i don't comprehend. have you ever seen the reality that the explanation why a dinosaurs innovations develop into plenty larger than a human innovations develop into because of the fact dinosaurs have been quite super animals? How interior the international could a dinosaurs innovations slot in a human beings head?!?! Please think of. don't be ignorant. the explanation why human brains have stepped forward plenty is by using the fact ALL SPECIES do no longer EVOLVE on the comparable fee. have you ever taken a glance at a coelacanth? they seem to be historical creatures dwelling interior the incorrect era. Evolution does not are looking forward to how briskly a species will evolve. right here i will even refer a e book which you will ascertain to offer you a head initiate. Please practice us how and the place you obtain the "actuality" that a snail from a million million years in the past looks comparable to a minimum of one in contemporary time.

2016-12-11 12:58:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, the Bible is proof that Jesus lived, as are ancient Roman documents and stories. But what I want to know is why you think that just because Jesus lived, there is no such thing as evolution.

And if you want proof that evolution does exist? Just consult any accredited scientist. That should do the trick.

2006-08-21 15:42:21 · answer #3 · answered by Mateo 2 · 3 0

bones bones bones........and the bible is nothing more than oral fables that were wrote down so that children would do as the parents wanted..... kinda like the Brothers Grimm... I want to know how a book is proof that God and Jesus were what they are said to be?

2006-08-21 15:49:15 · answer #4 · answered by munkeybusines 2 · 2 0

I realize that you are borderline illiterate, and also don't seem to know anything about evolution, so this link which presents mountains of evidence for evolution is wasted on you:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

Even if you could manage to sound out the words, I doubt that you have the courage to actually read this and confront the evidence.

You'll ignore the link, and go on pretending that the evidence doesn't exist... and spend the rest of your sad little uneducated life running from it.

2006-08-21 15:58:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The bible isn't a credible source for anything, really. As for your proof of evolution, try reading this: http://www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/essays/courtenay1.htm

2006-08-21 15:42:36 · answer #6 · answered by Girl Wonder 5 · 3 0

There is absolutely no proof that humans ever came from another species. It's totally ridiculous. It's like saying that a jet fighter "evolved" from the Wright brother's plane because they both have wings and an engine and we see a lot of other airplanes with wings and engines too so they must have had a common "ancestor".


Human Evolution: What is it?
Human evolution is not supported by the fossil evidence. Much of the alleged evidence that filled text books over the last 50 years has now been reclassified or rejected altogether. The missing links are still missing.

Human Evolution: The Legacy of the Fossil Evidence
Human evolution has many issues, including the realities of genetics, biochemistry, design theory, irreducible complexity, DNA structure, and information systems. However, the reality of the human fossil record alone is enough to reject the theory of human evolution all together. Here are just a few of the major problems with the alleged fossil record of the past century:

Ramapithecus was widely recognized as a direct ancestor of humans. It is now established that he was merely an extinct type of orangutan.

Piltdown man was hyped as the missing link in publications for over 40 years. He was a fraud based on a human skull cap and an orangutan's jaw.

Nebraska man was a fraud based on a single tooth of a rare type of pig.

Java man was based on sketchy evidence of a femur, skull cap and three teeth found within a wide area over a one year period. It turns out the bones were found in an area of human remains, and now the femur is considered human and the skull cap from a large ape.

Neandertal man was traditionally depicted as a stooped ape-man. It is now accepted that the alleged posture was due to disease and that Neandertal is just a variation of the human kind.

Human Evolution: The Current Tree
Human evolution has its currently fashionable specimens that lead from small ape-like creatures to Homo sapiens. These are examples of the most recent alleged links:

Australopithecus afarensis, or "Lucy," has been considered a missing link for years. However, studies of the inner ear, skulls and bones have shown that she was merely a pygmy chimpanzee that walked a bit more upright than some other apes. She was not on her way to becoming human.

Homo erectus has been found throughout the world. He is smaller than the average human of today, with a proportionately smaller head and brain cavity. However, the brain size is within the range of people today and studies of the middle ear have shown that he was just like current Homo sapiens. Remains are found throughout the world in the same proximity to remains of ordinary humans, suggesting coexistence. Australopithecus africanus and Peking man were presented as ape-men missing links for years, but are now both considered Homo erectus.

Homo habilis is now generally considered to be comprised of pieces of various other types of creatures, such as Australopithecus and Homo erectus, and is not generally viewed as a valid classification.

Human Evolution: The Most Recent Find
In July 2002, anthropologists announced the discovery of a skull in Chad with "an unusual mixture of primitive and humanlike features." The find was dubbed "Toumai" (the name give to children in Chad born close to the dry season) and was immediately hailed as "the earliest member of the human family found so far." By October 2002, a number of scientists went on record to criticize the premature claim -- declaring that the discovery is merely the fossil of an ape.

Human Evolution: The Theory Has No Support in the Fossil Record

Human evolution is a theory in denial. With all of this fossil evidence (or lack thereof) it becomes increasingly clear to an earnest seeker that human evolution did not happen at all.

2006-08-21 15:43:52 · answer #7 · answered by Martin S 7 · 0 4

Hearsay is not even allowed in a court of law. The Bible is only evidence of ancient people's opinions. It does not prove creationism.

2006-08-21 15:43:44 · answer #8 · answered by scifiguy 6 · 1 1

Here ya go, honey. Read this, then get out some old family photographs and take a look!

2006-08-21 15:45:07 · answer #9 · answered by GreenEyedLilo 7 · 0 0

Try reading a science text book.

2006-08-21 15:41:40 · answer #10 · answered by zilker 3 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers