Evolution has nothing to do with "how it all began". It explains how life changes once it's already here. You're confusing evolution with abiogenesis.
2006-08-21 14:49:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Basic atoms were in the atosphere millions of years ago when the earth began. Hydrogen, Carbon, and Nitrogen were in the air and land was comprised of Iron and Water. Over many years Volcanoes and Lightning storms provided the energy required to bond several of the atoms together to form simple 'organelles'. When a bunch of similar organelles gathered together the first cell was made and life took off from there.
2006-08-21 21:55:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Naturalists believe that matter grew more and more complex. Then at some point through an inexplicable process; complex inorganic matter became organic matter (presumably a single celled organism)
Then mechanisms of Darwin supposedly took charge and the rest is history for them......
Evolutionist's evidence for evo is as weak as my 3yr olds ability to punch me in the stomach. The person reading this could provide more convincing evidence that he/she is a Chinese jet pilot.
But Im sure they'll keep trying! They need something to believe in! A link below for scientific evidence for creation.........
2006-08-21 21:57:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
So far as I'm aware, Darwin had nothing to say on the matter. He only concerned himself with the mechanism of evolution - i.e. natural selection.
We still don't know how life got started, but what we *do* know is that there couldn't be an intelligence before there was a universe that it could evolve in, and therefore a creator god is logically impossible.
2006-08-21 21:49:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Darwin eventually threw out his theory of evolution and Believed In a Creator,
2006-08-21 21:52:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Terry S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution does not deal with the question of how it began. Evolution deals with what happened after it began.
As for the atom, that's cosmology.
As for the first cell, it is still a question-mark.
2006-08-21 21:50:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by bobkgin 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
No answer is better than "god did it." I'm perfectly OK with not knowing everything there is to know about the universe... that's impossible. We don't need to make up answers for everything. Remember, Darwins work was called "Origin of Species" not "Origin of Life."
2006-08-21 21:50:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
it began probably from electrically stimulated (think lightning) in a soup or primordial sludge..which contained amino acids...once a string of molecules can replicate itself..watch out..life happens.
2006-08-21 21:52:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Darwin didn't speculate on how it all began... he only presented his ideas for how and why it changes.
2006-08-21 21:50:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What Icarus said.
2006-08-21 21:49:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋