do you think g w bush should have sent spys into iraq before the war?

Question

he charged into iraq frist saying that ossama billadon is there than he says weapons of mass discrution(wich is lie) and than he busts thier presdent wich is about to start a civil war and let iran send weapons to hizaballa and y did they put israel in the middle east

Answer 1

yes, but he and Cheney had decided to invade Iraq anyway,, before 9-11

Answer 2

There were spies in Iraq, then UN was monitoring everything as well. It didn't make indifference the decision to invade Iraq was made months after 9/11. The real reason of the war isn't terror or Saddam, that was just a facade. It's strategic control of resources and to exercise NSA Homeland Security measures that went into effect in September 2002. In regards to controlling resources, a lot of Asian and European countries got their oil from Iraq. Now that we control it, they have to get it from US oil companies. Same game as Iran in the 1950's and Kuwait in 1991. Invaded/rescued under "humanitarian" pretenses, but in actuality were the result of protecting corporate interests.

Answer 3

Bush became into no longer a puppet different than by skill of his very own choosing. The President has each and all of the flexibility, his cabinet none, and incredibly the vice-president who has no constitutional place different than presiding over the Senate. most of the arguments that the Bush admin made, they knew to be lies on the time (somewhat approximately procuring yellowcake from Niger). apart from, it became into obtrusive in the process the weeks previously the warfare that the UN inspectors have been very on the threshold of determining (wisely) that Iraq had no functioning WMDs. all and sundry who became into following the story on the time knew, on the day of the invasion, that no WMDs might ever be present in Iraq. even though it wasn't precisely mendacity; a extreme mass of people (Republicans consistent with danger) by no skill cared approximately WMDs in the 1st place, and in basic terms needed some good marvel and awe. In that admire WMDs have been in basic terms a fig leaf for a countrywide atavistic urge to kill and break. edit-"WMD-appropriate supplies", dismantled and left over from previously wilderness typhoon, and fully ineffective to Saddam in 2002, do no longer count quantity as WMDs.

Answer 4

Our spies in the middle east and elswhere were removed by Bill Clinton. He thought it would be cool to spy with computers only. He removed our operatives and left us blind. He also had three opportunities to take out bin-Laden and didn't do it. Another one of his worthless accomplishments was a missle treaty with North Korea. He sent thousands of tons of rice to feed the people and it fed the North Korean army. As if that wasn't enough, he couldn't negotiate a treaty between Israel and the Palestinians. What a dud.

Answer 5

You listen to the drive-by media a whole lot, right? He never said Bin Laden was in Iraq. Where you been? It has already been proven Hussein moved his WMD out of Iraq.

He did what? Where did you hear he allowed Iran to arm Hezbollah? Iran and Syria have been financing Hezbollah for at least the past ten years. Get your facts straight before you whine and cry.

Answer 6

He did, so did Israel, England as well as the US. They all said the same thing there were weapons of mass destruction there. The dirty little secret is that russia help remove them slightly before and during the invasion. You assume something is a lie before knowing the truth of the matter, it makes you look ignorant and politically biased to those of us who have actually done a little research in this.

Answer 7

Unfortunately we can't fix yesterday. America had agents in Iraq but powers outside their control proved greater and the result is the nation (your nation) is in the situation it is. The lesson for everybody is that you never sign on unless you're willing to ride it through to the end - Americans rallied behind their president then and so must they now. I am not an American by the way...

Answer 8

No, what the dumbass should have did was listen to his generals who said we needed between 200,000 and 300,000 troops when the invasion began. Instead the moron in charge listens to Donald Dumbsfeld and deploys a grossly inadequate amount of troops. And now look what we have? A quagmire. But of course, this is all the democrats fault, right conservatives?

Answer 9

Like wow-where have you been all your life? We got spies in almost every country on earth. We had spies in Iraq years ago.

Answer 10

I think we should NUKE all of those camel jockeys that should help their cause of F U C King with everyone in the world. Go find ALA and let me help!

Answer 11

This was the problem in the first place. Lack of HUMINT.
Human Intelligence. Due to downsizing, cutting costs, by
bean counters in bureacracies, who know nothing of the real
dangers in our world.